|
"Let
the Bodhisattva look upon all things as having the nature of space, - as
permanently equal to space; without essence, without substantiality." -
SADDHARIMA-PUNDARÎKA.
I HAVE
wandered to the verge of the town; and the street I followed has roughened into
a country road, and begins to curve away through rice-fields toward a hamlet at
the foot of the hills. Between town and rice-fields a vague unoccupied stretch
of land makes a favorite playground for children. There are trees, and spaces
of grass to roll on, and many butterflies, and plenty of little stones. I stop
to look at the children.
By the
roadside some are amusing themselves with wet clay, making tiny models of
mountains and rivers and rice-fields; tiny mud villages, also, - imitations of
peasants' huts, - and little mud temples, and mud gardens with
{p. 85}
ponds and humped bridges
and imitations of stone-lanterns (tôrô); likewise miniature cemeteries,
with bits of broken stone for monuments. And they play at funerals, - burying
corpses of butterflies and semi (cicadæ), and pretending to repeat Buddhist
sutras over the grave. To-morrow they will not dare to do this; for to-morrow
will be the first day of the festival of the Dead. During that festival it is
strictly forbidden to molest insects, especially semi, some of which have on
their heads little red characters said to be names of Souls.
Children
in all countries play at death. Before the sense of personal identity comes,
death cannot be seriously considered; and childhood thinks in this regard more
correctly, perhaps, than self-conscious maturity. Of course, if these little
ones were told, some bright morning, that a playfellow had gone away forever, -
gone away to be reborn elsewhere, - there would be a very real though vague
sense of loss, and much wiping of eyes with many-colored sleeves; but presently
the loss would be forgotten and the playing resumed. The idea of ceasing to
exist could not possibly enter
{p. 86}
a child-mind: the
butterflies and birds, the flowers, the foliage, the sweet summer itself, only
play at dying; - they seem to go, but they all come back again after the snow
is gone. The real sorrow and fear of death arise in us only through slow
accumulation of experience with doubt and pain; and these little boys and
girls, being Japanese and Buddhists, will never, in any event, feel about death
just as you or I do. They will find reason to fear it for somebody else's sake,
but not for their own, because they will learn that they have died millions of
times already, and have forgotten the trouble of it, much as one forgets the
pain of successive toothaches. In the strangely penetrant light of their creed,
teaching the ghostliness of all substance, granite or gossamer, - just as those
lately found X-rays make visible the ghostliness of flesh, - this their present
world, with its bigger mountains and rivers and rice-fields, will not appear to
them much more real than the mud. landscapes which they made in childhood. And
much more real it probably is not.
At which
thought I am conscious of a sudden soft shock, a familiar shock, and know
{p. 87}
myself seized by the idea
of Substance as Non-Reality.
This sense
of the voidness of things comes only when the temperature of the air is so
equably related to the temperature of life that I can forget having a body.
Cold compels painful notions of solidity; cold sharpens the delusion of
personality; cold quickens egotism; cold numbs thought, and shrivels up the
little wings of dreams.
To-day is
one of those warm, hushed days when it is possible to think of things as they
are, - when ocean, peak, and plain seem no more real than the arching of blue
emptiness above them. All is mirage, - my physical self, and the sunlit road,
and the slow rippling of the grain under a sleepy wind, and the thatched roofs
beyond the haze of the rice-fields, and the blue crumpling of the naked hills
behind everything. I have the double sensation of being myself a ghost and of
being haunted, - haunted by the prodigious luminous Spectre of the World.
There are
men and women working in those
{p. 88}
fields. Colored moving
shadows they are; and the earth under them - out of which they rose, and back
to which they will go -is equally shadow. Only the Forces behind the shadow,
that make and unmake, are real, - therefore viewless.
Somewhat
as Night devours all lesser shadow will this phantasmal earth swallow us at
last, and itself thereafter vanish away. But the little shadows and the
Shadow-Eater must as certainly reappear, - must rematerialize somewhere and
somehow. This ground beneath me is old as the Milky Way. Call it what you
please, - clay, soil, dust: its names are but symbols of human sensations
having nothing in common with it. Really it is nameless and unnamable, being a
mass of energies, tendencies, infinite possibilities; for it was made by the
beating of that shoreless Sea of Birth and Death whose surges billow unseen out
of eternal Night to burst in foam of stars. Lifeless it is not: it feeds upon
life, and visible life grows out of it. Dust it is of Karma, waiting to enter
into novel combinations, - dust of elder Being in that state between birth and
birth which the Buddhist calls Chû-U.
{p. 89}
It is made of forces, and
of nothing else; and those forces are not of this planet only, but of vanished
spheres innumerable.
Is there
aught visible, tangible, measurable, that has never been mixed with sentiency? -
atom that has never vibrated to pleasure or to pain? - air that has never been
cry or speech? - drop that has never been a tear? Assuredly this dust has felt.
It has been everything we know; also much that we cannot know. It has been
nebula and star, planet and moon, times unspeakable. Deity also it has been, -
the Sun-God of worlds that circled and worshiped in other æons. "Remember,
Man, thou art but dust!" - a saying profound only as materialism,
which stops short at surfaces. For what is dust? "Remember, Dust, thou
hast been Sun, and Sun thou shalt become again! . . . Thou hast been Light,
Life, Love; - and into all these, by ceaseless cosmic magic, thou shalt many
times be turned again!"
For this
Cosmic Apparition is more than evolution alternating with dissolution: it is
{p. 90}
infinite metempsychosis; it
is perpetual palingenesis. Those old predictions of a bodily resurrection were
not falsehoods; they were rather foreshadowings of a truth vaster than all
myths and deeper than all religions.
Suns
yield up their ghosts of flame; but out of their graves new suns rush into
being. Corpses of worlds pass all to some solar funeral pyre; but out of their
own ashes they are born again. This earth must die: her seas shall be Saharas.
But those seas once existed in the sun; and their dead tides, revived by fire,
will pour their thunder upon the coasts of another world. Transmigration -
transmutation: these are not fables! What is impossible? Not the dreams of
alchemists and poets; - dross may indeed be changed to gold, the jewel to the
living eye, the flower into flesh. What is impossible? If seas can pass from
world to sun, from sun to world again, what of the dust of dead selves, - dust
of memory and thought? Resurrection there is, - but a resurrection more
stupendous than any dreamed of by Western creeds. Dead emotions will revive as
surely as dead suns and moons. Only, so far as we can just now
{p. 91}
discern, there will be no
return of identical individualities. The reapparition will always be a recombination
of the preëxisting, a readjustment of affinities, a reintegration of being
informed with the experience of anterior being. The Cosmos is a Karma.
Merely by
reason of illusion and folly do we shrink from the notion of self-instability.
For what is our individuality? Most certainly it is not individuality at all:
it is multiplicity incalculable. What is the human body? A form built up out of
billions of living entities, an impermanent agglomeration of individuals called
cells. And the human soul? A composite of quintillions of souls. We are, each
and all, infinite compounds of fragments of anterior lives. And the universal
process that continually dissolves and continually constructs personality has
always been going on, and is even at this moment going on, in every one of us.
What being ever had a totally new feeling an absolutely new idea? All our
emotions and thoughts and wishes, however changing and growing through the
varying seasons of life, are only compositions and recompositions
{p. 92}
of the sensations and ideas
and desires of other folk, mostly of dead people, - millions of billions of
dead people. Cells and souls are themselves recombinations, present
aggregations of past knittings of forces, - forces about which nothing is known
save that they belong to the Shadow-Makers of universes.
Whether
you (by you I mean any other agglomeration of souls) really wish for
immortality as an agglomeration, I cannot tell. But I confess that "my
mind to me a kingdom is" - not! Rather it is a fantastical republic, daily
troubled by more revolutions than ever occurred in South
America; and the nominal government, supposed to be rational,
declares that an eternity of such anarchy is not desirable. I have souls
wanting to soar in air, and souls wanting to swim in water (seawater, I think),
and souls wanting to live in woods or on mountain tops. I have souls longing
for the tumult of great cities, and souls longing to dwell in tropical
solitude; - souls, also, in various stages of naked savagery; - souls demanding
nomad freedom without tribute; - souls conservative, delicate, loyal to empire
and to feudal tradition, and
{p. 93}
souls that are Nihilists,
deserving Siberia; - sleepless souls, hating inaction, and hermit souls,
dwelling in such meditative isolation that only at intervals of years can I
feel them moving about; - souls that have faith in fetiches; - polytheistic
souls; - souls proclaiming Islam; - and souls mediæval, loving cloister shadow
and incense and glimmer of tapers and the awful altitude of Gothic glooms.
Coöperation among all these is not to be thought of: always there is trouble, -
revolt, confusion, civil war. The majority detest this state of things:
multitudes would gladly emigrate. And the wiser minority feel that they need
never hope for better conditions until after the total demolition of the
existing social structure.
I
an individual, - an individual soul! Nay, I am a population, - a population
unthinkable for multitude, even by groups of a thousand millions! Generations of
generations I am, æons of æons! Countless times the concourse now making me has
been scattered, and mixed with other scatterings. Of what concern, then, the
next disintegration? Perhaps, after trillions
{p. 94}
of ages of burning in
different dynasties of suns, the very best of me may come together again.
If one
could only imagine some explanation of the Why! The questions of the Whence and
the Whither are much less troublesome, since the Present assures us, even though
vaguely, of Future and Past. But the Why!
The
cooing voice of a little girl dissolves my reverie. She is trying to teach a
child brother how to make the Chinese character for Man, - I mean Man with a
big M. First she draws in the dust a stroke sloping downwards from right to
left, so:

then she draws another
curving downwards from left to right, thus: -

joining the two so as to
form the perfect ji, or character, hito, meaning a person of
either sex, or mankind: -

{p. 95}
Then she tries to impress
the idea of this shape on the baby memory by help of a practical illustration,
- probably learned at school. She breaks a slip of wood in two pieces, and
manages to balance the pieces against each other at about the same angle as that
made by the two strokes of the character. "Now see," she says:
"each stands only by help of the other. One by itself cannot stand.
Therefore the ji is like mankind. Without help one person cannot live in
this world; but by getting help and giving help everybody can live. If nobody
helped anybody, all people would fall down and die."
This
explanation is not philologically exact; the two strokes evolutionally standing
for a pair of legs, - all that survives in the modern ideograph of the whole
man figured in the primitive picture-writing. But the pretty moral fancy is
much more important than the scientific fact. It is also one charming example
of that old-fashioned method of teaching which invested every form and every
incident with ethical signification. Besides, as a mere item of moral
information, it contains the essence of all earthly religion, and the best
{p. 96}
part of all earthly
philosophy. A world-priestess she is, this dear little maid, with her dove's
voice and her innocent gospel of one letter! Verily in that gospel lies the
only possible present answer to ultimate problems. Were its whole meaning
universally felt, - were its whole suggestion of the spiritual and material law
of love and help universally obeyed, - forthwith, according to the Idealists,
this seemingly solid visible world would vanish away like smoke! For it has
been written that in whatsoever time all human minds accord in thought and will
with the mind of the Teacher, there shall not remain even one particle of
dust that does not enter into Buddhahood.
{p. 97}
|