34 It was accordingly usual with
our ancestors, when a lad was being prepared for public speaking, as soon as he
was fully trained by home discipline, and his mind was stored with culture, to
have him taken by his father, or his relatives to the orator who held the
highest rank in the state. The boy used to accompany and attend him, and be
present at all his speeches, alike in the law-court and the assembly, and thus
he picked up the art of repartee, and became habituated to the strife of words,
and indeed, I may almost say, learnt how to fight in battle. Thereby young men
acquired from the first great experience and confidence, and a very large stock
of discrimination, for they were studying in broad daylight, in the very thick
of the conflict, where no one can say anything foolish or self-contradictory
without its being refuted by the judge, or ridiculed by the opponent, or, last
of all, repudiated by the very counsel with him. Thus from the beginning they
were imbued with true and genuine eloquence, and, although they attached
themselves to one pleader, still they became acquainted with all advocates of
their own standing in a multitude of cases before the courts. They had too
abundant experience of the popular ear in all its greatest varieties, and with
this they could easily ascertain what was liked or disapproved in each speaker.
Thus they were not in want of a teacher of the very best and choicest kind, who
could show them eloquence in her true features, not in a mere resemblance; nor
did they lack opponents and rivals, who fought with actual steel, not with a
wooden sword, and the audience too was always crowded, always changing, made up
of unfriendly as well as of admiring critics, so that neither success nor
failure could be disguised. You know, of course, that eloquence wins its great
and enduring fame quite as much from the benches of our opponents as from those
of our friends; nay, more, its rise from that quarter is steadier, and its
growth surer. Undoubtedly it was under such teachers that the youth of whom I
am speaking, the disciple of orators, the listener in the forum, the student in
the law-courts, was trained and practised by the experiences of others. The
laws he learnt by daily hearing; the faces of the judges were familiar to him;
the ways of popular assemblies were continually before his eyes; he had
frequent experience of the ear of the people, and whether he undertook a
prosecution or a defence, he was at once singly and alone equal to any case. We
still read with admiration the speeches in which Lucius Crassus in his
nineteenth, Caesar and Asinius Pollio in their twenty-first year, Calvus, when
very little older, denounced, respectively, Carbo, Dolabella, Cato, and
Vatinius.
|