Book,  chapter

 1    1,    2|      apparently copies of the same document in three different languages.
 2    1,    2|          have been effaced in each document, and by putting the scraps
 3    1,    2|  methodically. Here is the English document first.”~All that remained
 4    1,    2|            how?”~“By comparing one document with the other.”~“Let us
 5    1,    2|           The captain examined the document carefully, and said:~“Well,
 6    1,    2|            62 we have in the other document, it gives us the exact date,
 7    1,    2|           of it. Perhaps the third document may throw some light on
 8    1,    2|           is part of in the second document. It is GRAUSAM, the word
 9    1,    2|         exact latitude. The French document is decidedly the most complete
10    1,    2|         that was the most complete document of the three.”~“Your Lordship
11    1,    2|       contin pr cruel indi~jete ce document de longitude~et 37 degrees
12    1,    2|          pr cruel indi~thrown this document in longitude~and 37 degrees
13    1,    2|          on to London and lay this document before the Admiralty.”~The
14    1,    2|           to be considered in this document—the things we know, the
15    1,    2|         and the captain threw this document into the sea in 37 degrees
16    1,    2|           up the blanks? Isn’t the document quite clear now? Isn’t the
17    1,    2|            the sea has made in the document as easily as if Captain
18    1,    2|     Indians. They have thrown this document into the sea, in longitude
19    1,    3|   recounted the whole story of the document, telling them that their
20    1,    3|      husband determined to lay the document before the Lords of the
21    1,    4|       Admiralty with regard to the document. Nor did she mention the
22    1,    4|         Franklin, and declared the document was obscure and unintelligible.
23    1,    7|            his request, the famous document was brought out. He studied
24    1,    8|        providence that sent us the document, and we set out in consequence.
25    1,   10|        Jacques Paganel took up the document and began studying it again.
26    1,   10|    erroneous interpretation of the document? Is there anything illogical
27    1,   10|         and I further add that the document states it unmistakably.”~“
28    1,   10|             Instead of reading the document seront prisonniers, read
29    1,   16|          rendering of the eventful document.~In pursuing the course
30    1,   16|             and the finding of the document would appear to him a mere
31    1,   16|     perfectly with the date of the document. But one question still
32    1,   21|       however, to let him have the document again, on the faith of which
33    1,   21|       America; but where he is the document must say, and it shall say,
34    1,   22|          and over the words of the document, and trying to discover
35    1,   23|         searched exactly where the document stated?~“And yet,” he said, “
36    1,   23|            distinctly named in the document.”~“And would you recommence
37    1,   24|       wrong track, and read on the document what was never there.”~“
38    1,   24|            across my mind, and the document became clear as day.”~“What!”
39    1,   24|         AUSTRAL that occurs in the document is not a complete word,
40    1,   24|          dare to contend, with the document in your hand, that the shipwreck
41    1,   24|           then. In the text of the document, there is neither mention
42    1,   24|        evident. If I had found the document myself, and my judgment
43    1,   24|       interpretation? How will the document read?”~“Easily enough answered.
44    1,   24|       enough answered. Here is the document,” replied Paganel, taking
45    1,   26|          new interpretation of the document, and the consequent hopes
46    2,    1|          new interpretation of the document, due to the sagacity of
47    2,    1|          our interpretation of the document was erroneous. Most fortunately,
48    2,    1|        track, and so explained the document that all doubt whatever
49    2,    1|         our minds. However, as the document is in French, I will ask
50    2,    1|         precise indications of the document.”~“Nothing can be more easily
51    2,    1|           none of the words of the document could relate to these islands.”~
52    2,    4|           but went and fetched the document. After perusing it, he still
53    2,    4|        instead of ‘7 June’ on this document, suppose that one figure
54    2,    4|            there is nothing in the document to indicate which shore
55    2,    4|            seems probable from the document, we shall find him.”~“And
56    2,    6|       exact point indicated by the document.~On the 20th of December,
57    2,    6|     ingenious hypothesis about the document? viz., that it had been
58    2,    6|       related the discovery of the document, and the various attempts
59    2,    7|           sailors mentioned in the document?”~“No; I was not aware of
60    2,    7|            of the existence of the document. The captain must have thrown
61    2,    7|   exclaimed Paganel. “Ah, precious document,” he added, with perfect
62    2,    7|  immediately to fetch his official document, and, though hardly absent
63    2,    7|          for his possession of the document if he were not the man named
64    2,   14|           position exactly, as the document proves, and the reason he
65    2,   17|    erroneous interpretation of the document. Gloomy silence fell on
66    2,   17|            vexation: “That unlucky document! It may boast of having
67    2,   17|     vexations, it must be said the document was always uppermost in
68    3,    1|        third interpretation of the document. Besides, what could he
69    3,    2|       revolving the meaning of the document. He was possessed with the
70    3,   15|            the authenticity of the document was indisputable, and that
71    3,   17|          irrevocably lost, and the document did not appear to allow
72    3,   18| disembarkation, and also about the document and the loss of the ship
73    3,   18|           the date assigned by the document to the shipwreck—the 27th
74    3,   18|           fragmentary words in the document that could apply to New
75    3,   18|         know?”~“From that infernal document.”~“Ah!” said the Major,
76    3,   18|           the words in the English document, one that hitherto we had
77    3,   18|            naturally on the French document, as it was most complete,
78    3,   18|          am going to translate the document according to my third interpretation,
79    3,   18|          was founded on the French document; and don’t forget it was
80    3,   18|         INDIgence, ils ont jete ce document par—de lon_gitude ET 37
81    3,   18|   indigence, they have thrown this document into the sea in— longitude
82    3,   18|   indicated by the latitude of the document.”~“But since then, when
83    3,   20|         hieroglyphical~V. IV Verne document which he had placed in a
84    3,   20|   thousandth time the words of the document. He pondered his three successive
85    3,   20|         was in your indecipherable document?”~A general curiosity was
86    3,   20|           the precise words of the document?”~“Exactly,” replied Harry
87    3,   20|             let us have the French document,” replied Glenarvan. “That
88    3,   20|         indigence, ils ont jete ce document par 153 degrees de longitude
89    3,   20|      deciphered the indecipherable document. The names Patagonia, Australia,