Book,  chapter

 1    1,    2|          the mere mention of it?”~“Patagonia!” exclaimed Lady Helena.~“
 2    1,    2|              Undoubtedly.”~“But is Patagonia crossed by the 37th parallel?”
 3    1,    2|        South America. “Yes, it is; Patagonia just touches the 37th parallel.
 4    1,    2|           occurred on the coast of Patagonia, but still I will have inquiries
 5    1,    2|            is lost on the coast of Patagonia. The few broken disjointed
 6    1,    2|           has sunk on the coast of Patagonia, in the southern hemisphere.
 7    1,    3|            wrecked on the coast of Patagonia, and that he and two sailors,
 8    1,    4|          said, to hunt all through Patagonia for three menthree Scotchmen;
 9    1,    7|          can’t take him with us to Patagonia.”~“Why not?” replied McNabbs,
10    1,    7|         cast away on the shores of Patagonia, and we could not alter
11    1,    8|       inhabitants of the Pampas in Patagonia are as much Indians as the
12    1,    8|      Society would have sent me to Patagonia as soon as to India, if
13    1,    9|          him. He would insist that Patagonia without Patagonians was
14    1,    9|        without Patagonians was not Patagonia at all.~But Glenarvan replied:~“
15    1,    9|           But surely the very name Patagonia, which meansgreat feet’
16    1,   10|      Glenarvan. “Does not the name Patagonia seem apparent even to the
17    1,   16|        calledThaouka,” a word in Patagonia which means bird, and he
18    1,   20|        violent and cold winds from Patagonia, which constantly agitate
19    1,   23|         pattern, I must compliment Patagonia.”~“I protest against leaving
20    1,   23|        Harry Grant, from this very Patagonia so distinctly named in the
21    1,   24|      mention of the Indians nor of Patagonia! The incomplete word INDI
22    1,   24|          It has nothing to do with Patagonia,” said Paganel. “Read it
23    2,    1|            that, as far as regards Patagonia, our interpretation of the
24    2,    1|           but the western coast of Patagonia could possibly, we thought,
25    2,    6|         plausible enough theory in Patagonia, but not in the part of
26    3,    2|          his ruling thought. After Patagonia, after Australia, his imagination,
27    3,   20| indecipherable document. The names Patagonia, Australia, New Zealand,
28    3,   21|          sailed along the coast of Patagonia, doubled Cape Horn, and
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA1) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2009. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License