Part, chapter

 1    1,    1|           to begin by counting the number of words it contains, and
 2    1,    3|         blacks to about double the number, who were not yet free,
 3    1,    5|          smaller affluents without number, by the side of which the
 4    1,    9|        were on board a respectable number of frasques (each holding
 5    1,    9|           feel astonished that the number of Indians and negroes embarked
 6    1,    9|            raft, and that a larger number were not taken in case of
 7    1,    9|         But there are only a small number of these fugitives, they
 8    1,    9|           other hand, there were a number of settlements on the river—
 9    1,   10|          Mississippi islands; they number then——”~“As they number
10    1,   10|            number then——”~“As they number the avenues and streets
11    1,   11|           more than two hundred in number, and on the banks of the
12    1,   12|             and among them a large number of the palms, whose supple
13    1,   14|           is peculiar to a certain number of these tributaries of
14    1,   14|           of the Culino Indians.~A number of islands were breasted—
15    1,   15|          of attracting the greater number of turtles, there has been
16    1,   15|     alligators in the river, their number has been so diminished that
17    1,   15|           which are fed by a great number of petty affluents.~“It
18    1,   17|  negligence or bad management, the number of these trees is decreasing
19    2,    1|            to be attributed to the number of its public buildings,
20    2,    1|         Manaos does not exceed the number above given, and after reckoning
21    2,   12|          pronounceable word, whose number of consonants is in proportion
22    2,   13|       cipher, that is to say, on a number.”~“Well, sir,” answered
23    2,   13|        basis of this document is a number, or, as you call it, a cipher?”~“
24    2,   13|          is subject to the laws of number.”~“And that is?”~“That is
25    2,   13|         basis of the document is a number. It shows à priori that
26    2,   13|       virtue of the ciphers of the number and according to the place
27    2,   13|           by a cipher?”~“Tell me a number.”~“Any number you like.”~“
28    2,   13|            Tell me a number.”~“Any number you like.”~“Give me an example
29    2,   13|            face, “suppose I take a number by chance, so as to give
30    2,   13|           the line below I put the number 234, and repeat it as many
31    2,   13|          ciphers which compose the number I come to the end of the
32    2,   13| consequently if we do not know the number of the document it remains
33    2,   13|            the hope of finding the number!”~“We might have done so,”
34    2,   13|           impossible to evolve the number which is the key of the
35    2,   13|          been able to discover the number with ease; and the number
36    2,   13|          number with ease; and the number I was in search of is really
37    2,   13|            the first cipher of the number should happen to be the
38    2,   13|          chance might give us this number.”~“This number,” exclaimed
39    2,   13|        give us this number.”~“This number,” exclaimed the magistrate—“
40    2,   13|     exclaimed the magistrate—“this number? But how many ciphers is
41    2,   13|       cipher more than once in the number, these millions of combinations
42    2,   14|          key to the document was a number, composed of two or more
43    2,   14|        more ciphers, but what this number was all investigation seemed
44    2,   14|     superhumanly.~To arrive at the number by chance, he said, was
45    2,   14|      cryptological equivalents the number could be arrived at. But
46    2,   14|           as I cannot hit upon the number from the arrangement of
47    2,   14|           letters, let us see what number the author of the document
48    2,   14|          Was he likely to forget a number which was so important to
49    2,   14|            us as a cryptographical number.”~And Judge Jarriquez wrote
50    2,   14|          and putting over them the number 1804 repeated thrice, he
51    2,   14|     Jarriques. “Let us try another number.”~And he asked himself,
52    2,   14|           same reason.~“Bother the number!” exclaimed the magistrate. “
53    2,   14|       Perhaps the rascal chose the number of contos representing the
54    2,   14|    execution, etc., etc., even the number of victims at the affray
55    2,   14|           you understand—the first number than comes into your head.”~“
56    2,   14|        made out a formula with the number given by Bobo, and which
57    2,   14|           was most unlikely that a number such as 76223 was the key
58    2,   15|      ingenuity had failed, and the number still escaped them.~“Why
59    2,   18|  consequently they might yield the number.~And when he reduced the
60    2,   18|            2 5 1 3~S u v j h d~The number thus disclosed was 432513.~
61    2,   18|           was 432513.~But was this number that which had been used
62    2,   18|     Jarriquez had placed the given number above the first letters
63    2,   18|          delight escaped him! This number, 432513, was the number
64    2,   18|            number, 432513, was the number sought for so long! The
65    2,   19|           document by means of the number, and as the words appeared
66    2,   19|       perpetrated!~By means of the number Judge Jarriquez interpreted
67    2,   19|            breath he whispered the number 432513, without which the
68    2,   19|         Ortega to reconstitute the number which the author of the