Part, chapter

 1    1,   19|          Joam Garral.~“Well, his crime did not do him much good,
 2    1,   19|          to feel remorse for his crime.”~Here they all rose from
 3    1,   20|           whom they convicted of crime and sentenced to death,
 4    1,   20|      Dacosta was innocent of the crime for which he was condemned.”~“
 5    1,   20|    unhappy man who committed the crime?”~“Is dead.”~“Dead!” exclaimed
 6    1,   20|       knew a long time after his crime, and without knowing that
 7    2,    2|     twenty-three years ago for a crime which he never committed!”~“
 8    2,    2|         back for this abominable crime at Tijuco?”~“I do not know,”
 9    2,    2|          the real author of this crime. He shall speak out. And
10    2,    2|          principal author of the crime of Tijuco, which had formerly
11    2,    3|      true and only author of the crime.~Ribeiro defended him with
12    2,    3|   sentence was possible, for the crime was committed in the diamond
13    2,    3|        of the accomplices of the crime, of the smugglers who had
14    2,    4|   twenty-three years ago for the crime at Tijuco; no limitation
15    2,    5|        of the true author of the crime of Tijuco.~“And what is
16    2,    5| handwriting of the author of the crime, he has assured me is in
17    2,    6|          was I who committed the crime.”~“Well, we must now commence
18    2,    6|       him the real author of the crime of Tijuco!”~“You say that
19    2,    7|       the memory of the terrible crime of Tijuco, which had lain
20    2,    7|         the circumstances of the crime, showed itself decidedly
21    2,    7|        who was the author of the crime of Tijuco, or under what
22    2,   11|        of the true author of the crime of Tijuco, and which Torres
23    2,   12|        was not the author of the crime, and it does not help us
24    2,   13|     written by the author of the crime? that this paper was the
25    2,   14|          principal author of the crime of Tijuco now averred that
26    2,   14|          that it referred to the crime in the diamond arrayal?
27    2,   14|         he was the author of the crime at Tijuco.”~This was another
28    2,   14|         of the year in which the crime was committed.~This was
29    2,   14|       known to the author of the crime, the date of his arrest,
30    2,   15|         to be the author of this crime? Would that show that he
31    2,   15|       himself the author of this crime, and exonerated Joam Dacosta?
32    2,   15|        escape the expiation of a crime which is not his, you could
33    2,   16|   Dacosta the perpetrator of the crime at Tijuco would not be set
34    2,   17|      never lose his life for the crime of Tijuco!~Hardly ever did
35    2,   17|          real perpetrator of the crime, whether it contained or
36    2,   17|         author of so frightful a crime.~And now the noise outside
37    2,   18|       was the true author of the crime of Tijuco. But unfortunately
38    2,   18|     Ortega was the author of the crime of Tijuco, he had gained
39    2,   18|    document had reference to the crime of which Ortega was really
40    2,   18|         not he who committed the crime of Tijuco; it was the comrade
41    2,   19|                  CHAPTER XIX~THE CRIME OF TIJUCO~ON THE ARRIVAL
42    2,   19|           The true author of the crime of Tijuco confessed of his
43    2,   19|         had helped to commit the crime.~Penniless, and unable to
44    2,   19|           The remembrance of his crime became horrible to him.
45    2,   19|        the facts relative to the crime of Tijuco, writing it first
46    2,   19|          which the author of the crime and Torres, both of whom
47    2,   19|       that the confession of his crime, with the minutest details