Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
have 225
having 7
hazard 1
he 729
head 1
heads 1
heaped 2
Frequency    [«  »]
945 of
837 that
766 and
729 he
638 it
628 not
603 is
Anselmus Cantuariensis
Cur Deus homo

IntraText - Concordances

he

1-500 | 501-729

    Book, Chapter
501 II, 1| as possible in his sin, he should make to God the greatest 502 II, 1| true.~Anselm.. Therefore, he who wishes to make atonement 503 II, 1| should be one who can die if he chooses.~Boso. I think it 504 II, 1| eternal happiness, when he conversed with men, and 505 II, 1| conversed with men, and when he taught them by personal 506 II, 1| ought to live? But how could he have given this example 507 II, 2| CHAPTER XII.~How, though he share in our weakness, he 508 II, 2| he share in our weakness, he is not therefore miserable. ~ 509 II, 2| things plainly show that he ought to be mortal and to 510 II, 2| things are our miseries. Will he then be miserable?~Anselm.. 511 II, 3| with our other weaknesses, he does not partake of our 512 II, 3| this likeness to men which he ought to have, he will inherit 513 II, 3| which he ought to have, he will inherit also our ignorance, 514 II, 3| inherit also our ignorance, as he does our other infirmities?~ 515 II, 3| Divine nature, yet will he be mortal in his human nature. 516 II, 3| human nature. For why will he not be like them in their 517 II, 3| them in their ignorance, as he is in their mortality?~Anselm.. 518 II, 3| very prejudicial. How can he perform works, so many and 519 II, 3| find him ignorant? And if he be ignorant, what will it 520 II, 3| there be no good thing which he does not love, then there 521 II, 3| perfectly understands good, save he who can distinguish it from 522 II, 3| what evil is. Therefore, as he of whom we are speaking 523 II, 3| can be no evil with which he is unacquainted. Therefore 524 II, 3| unacquainted. Therefore must he have all knowledge, though 525 II, 3| have all knowledge, though he do not openly show it in 526 II, 3| Years, this should seem to he as you say; but, in infancy, 527 II, 3| assume that mortality, which he makes use of so widely, 528 II, 3| so great an object. But he could not wisely assume 529 II, 4| before you, and you knew who he was, and it were told you 530 II, 5| answers the question when he says: "Had they known it, 531 II, 5| doubt, all things which he says of himself must be 532 II, 5| God cannot lie, and all he does must be received as 533 II, 5| words are true, and all that he does reasonable. But I ask 534 II, 6| virgin herself, from whom he sprang, was conceived in 535 II, 6| sinners, we doubt not that he is wholly without sin; yet 536 II, 6| this avail nothing, unless he be taken without sin and 537 II, 6| but before man was made he had not sinned so that he 538 II, 6| he had not sinned so that he ought not to be denied existence 539 II, 6| existence But after man was made he deserved, by his sin, to 540 II, 6| with its design; though he never has wholly lost this, 541 II, 6| wholly lost this, viz., that he should be one capable of 542 II, 6| things could take effect if he were annihilated. Therefore 543 II, 6| to become man, no doubt He will not lack the wisdom 544 II, 6| condemnation. And suppose that he who alone is blameless had 545 II, 6| very pleasing service which he was about to do for the 546 II, 6| appointed, acknowledged that he wished to obtain pardon 547 II, 6| gained the object for which he was made. For it seems unfitting 548 II, 6| and those creatures which he made for their use, to exist 549 II, 6| sins before his birth, and he was born of her in her purity.~ 550 II, 6| satisfy me, were it not that he ought to be pure of himself, 551 II, 6| pure of himself, whereas he appears to have his purity 552 II, 6| the mother's purity, which he partakes, was only derived 553 II, 6| was only derived from him, he also was pure by and of 554 II, 7| CHAPTER XVII.~How he did not die of necessity, 555 II, 7| die of necessity, though he could not be born, except 556 II, 7| death, when without this he could not have been born 557 II, 7| his death necessary, when he could not have been, except 558 II, 7| of future death? For if he were not to die, the virgin 559 II, 7| die, the virgin of whom he was born could not be pure, 560 II, 7| and, if she were not pure, he could not be born of her. 561 II, 7| being born of the virgin, he never could have been born 562 II, 7| considering the question whether he would lie, that there were 563 II, 7| having the power to lie, he was so constituted by nature 564 II, 7| we must not doubt that he always had the power to 565 II, 7| preserve his life, though he could not wish to do so 566 II, 7| this, arises from himself, he lays down his life not of 567 II, 7| preserve his life. For, if he wished to lie, he would 568 II, 7| For, if he wished to lie, he would of course be able 569 II, 7| course be able to; but, if he wished to avoid the other, 570 II, 7| wished to avoid the other, he could no more do it than 571 II, 7| could no more do it than he could avoid being what he 572 II, 7| he could avoid being what he is. For he became man for 573 II, 7| avoid being what he is. For he became man for this purpose, 574 II, 7| of his coming death that he could receive birth from 575 II, 7| Anselm.. As you think that he could not lie, or that his 576 II, 7| could not avoid being what he was, so you can assert that 577 II, 7| so you can assert that he could not wish to avoid 578 II, 7| to avoid death, or that he wished to die of necessity, 579 II, 7| die of necessity, because he could not change the constitution 580 II, 7| constitution of his being; for he did not become man in order 581 II, 7| become man in order that he should die, any more than 582 II, 7| than for this purpose, that he should wish to die. Wherefore, 583 II, 7| you ought not to say that he could not help wishing to 584 II, 7| it was of necessity that he wished to die, it is equally 585 II, 7| equally improper to say that he could not avoid death, or 586 II, 7| not avoid death, or that he died of necessity.~Boso. 587 II, 7| the same unchanging desire he should suffer death, and 588 II, 7| often as it is said that he does anything necessarily?~ 589 II, 7| wished that man to die, he could but die.~Anselm.. 590 II, 7| this desire, viz., that he should suffer death, you 591 II, 7| and the man whose person he took were so united that 592 II, 7| same as the will of God, he died not necessarily, but 593 II, 7| recurs to my mind: that, if he wished to avoid death, he 594 II, 7| he wished to avoid death, he could no more do it than 595 II, 7| could no more do it than he could escape existence. 596 II, 7| must have been fixed that he was to die, for had it not 597 II, 7| had it not been true that he was about to die, faith 598 II, 7| their sin. Wherefore, if he could avoid death, he could 599 II, 7| if he could avoid death, he could make untrue what was 600 II, 7| Why was it true, before he died, that he was certainly 601 II, 7| true, before he died, that he was certainly to die?~Boso. 602 II, 7| If, then, as you say, he could not avoid death because 603 II, 7| not avoid death because he was certainly to die, and 604 II, 7| still remains certain that he could not avoid death, but 605 II, 8| improper to affirm of God that he does anything, or that he 606 II, 8| he does anything, or that he cannot do it, of necessity. 607 II, 8| necessary or impossible save as He wishes it. Nay, the very 608 II, 8| contrary to truth. Since, then, he does what he chooses and 609 II, 8| Since, then, he does what he chooses and nothing else, 610 II, 8| eternally the same, for he himself is truth. Also, 611 II, 8| himself is truth. Also, if he has a fixed determination 612 II, 8| is no coercion as far as he is concerned, either to 613 II, 8| contrary, we imply that he has invincible authority 614 II, 8| Somebody can bind him," and, "He cannot be bound," instead 615 II, 8| to the affirmation that he cannot do anything. For 616 II, 8| not mean that, as far as he is concerned, there is any 617 II, 8| the choice of death, after he was born of the virgin, 618 II, 8| of his purpose, by which he freely became man for this 619 II, 8| persevering in his wish he should suffer death. And 620 II, 8| rather weakness than power if he could wish to lie, or deceive, 621 II, 8| disposition, when before he had chosen that it should 622 II, 8| unwilling to pay his vow, he could be compelled to do 623 II, 8| yet we must not say that he does it of necessity, but 624 II, 8| same freedom with which he made the resolution. For 625 II, 8| in reference to God; for he does nothing except according 626 II, 8| by faith in him, so that he might be born of her, even 627 II, 8| say, never believed that he was to die, save of his 628 II, 8| prophet, who said of him: "He was offered of his own will." 629 II, 8| concerning Christ were true, that he would die of his own free 630 II, 8| it should be so. For this he became man; for this he 631 II, 8| he became man; for this he did and suffered all things 632 II, 8| undertaken by him; for this he chose as he did. For therefore 633 II, 8| him; for this he chose as he did. For therefore were 634 II, 8| necessity of all things which he did and suffered, know that 635 II, 8| were of necessity, because he wished them to be. But no 636 II, 8| save by his will, then, had he not willed they would not 637 II, 8| took his life from him, but he laid it down of himself 638 II, 8| himself and took it again; for he had power to lay it down 639 II, 8| and to take it again, as he himself said.~Boso. You 640 II, 8| it cannot be proved that he was subjected to death by 641 II, 8| saving men by his death, when he could have done it in some 642 II, 8| man paid the debt which he owed God for his sin. And 643 II, 8| was able to do it; so that he who does it must be both 644 II, 8| his own person; so that he who in his own nature was 645 II, 8| the Son of God, and that he could be taken without sin, 646 II, 9| ought, and in what sense he ought not, or was not bound, 647 II, 9| to suffer. ~Anselm.. If he allowed himself to be slain 648 II, 9| for the sake of justice, he did not give his life for 649 II, 9| although I do not doubt it, how he could do this reasonably. 650 II, 9| reasonably. If I saw how he could be perfectly holy, 651 II, 9| I would acknowledge that he freely gave, for the honor 652 II, 9| you not perceive that when he bore with gentle patience 653 II, 9| crucifixion among thieves that he might maintain strict holiness; 654 II, 9| strict holiness; by this he set men an example that 655 II, 9| sacrifice? But how could he have done this, had he, 656 II, 9| could he have done this, had he, as he might have done, 657 II, 9| have done this, had he, as he might have done, avoided 658 II, 9| one ever gave to God what he was not obliged to lose, 659 II, 9| to lose, or paid a debt he did not owe. But he freely 660 II, 9| debt he did not owe. But he freely offered to the Father 661 II, 9| and paid for sinners what he owed not for himself. Therefore 662 II, 9| not for himself. Therefore he set a much nobler example, 663 II, 9| to God, for himself, what he must at any rate lose before 664 II, 9| the voice of reason; for he, when not in want of anything 665 II, 9| answer. You say that when he died he gave what he did 666 II, 9| You say that when he died he gave what he did not owe. 667 II, 9| when he died he gave what he did not owe. But no one 668 II, 9| for him, or that so doing he pleased God more than if 669 II, 9| pleased God more than if he had not done it. Nor will 670 II, 9| Nor will any one say that he was not bound to do what 671 II, 9| best to be done, and what he knew would be more pleasing 672 II, 9| then can we affirm that he did not owe God the thing 673 II, 9| owe God the thing which he did, that is, the thing 674 II, 9| that is, the thing which he knew to be best and most 675 II, 9| creature owes God all that he is and all that he knows 676 II, 9| that he is and all that he knows and all that he is 677 II, 9| that he knows and all that he is capable of?~Anselm.. 678 II, 9| doing or not doing a thing, he leaves the alternative with 679 II, 9| demanded. And, whichever he does, it may be said that 680 II, 9| does, it may be said that he ought to do it; and if he 681 II, 9| he ought to do it; and if he takes the better choice, 682 II, 9| takes the better choice, he deserves a reward; because 683 II, 9| deserves a reward; because he renders freely what is his 684 II, 9| enjoined upon man; so that both he who chooses marriage and 685 II, 9| who chooses marriage and he who prefers celibacy, may 686 II, 9| any of these things, this he ought to do. And if a man 687 II, 9| free gift offered to God, he looks for a reward. When 688 II, 9| the creature owes God what he knows to be the better choice, 689 II, 9| better choice, and what he is able to do, if you mean 690 II, 9| to do, if you mean that he owes it as a debt, without 691 II, 9| to be subject to him. And he wishes that all creatures 692 II, 9| own disposal, we say that he ought to do it, for what 693 II, 9| ought to do it, for what he wishes to be ought to be. 694 II, 9| So our Lord Jesus, when he wished, as we have said, 695 II, 9| have done precisely what he did; because he ought to 696 II, 9| precisely what he did; because he ought to be what he wished, 697 II, 9| because he ought to be what he wished, and was not bound 698 II, 9| do anything as a debt. As he is both God and man, in 699 II, 9| nature, which made him a man, he must also have received 700 II, 9| obligation, except to do as he chose. In like manner, as 701 II, 9| one person of the Trinity, he must have had whatever he 702 II, 9| he must have had whatever he possessed of his own right, 703 II, 9| Now I see clearly that he did not give himself up 704 II, 9| own reason proves, and yet he ought to have done what 705 II, 9| ought to have done what he did.~Anselm.. That honor 706 II, 9| whole Trinity; and, since he is very God, the Son of 707 II, 9| very God, the Son of God, he offered himself for his 708 II, 9| the Holy Spirit; that is, he gave his humanity to his 709 II, 9| whole Deity, to whom as man he offered himself. And, by 710 II, 0| surely will not think that he deserves no reward, who 711 II, 0| to reward the Son; else he is either unjust in not 712 II, 0| attributed to God.~Anselm.. He who rewards another either 713 II, 0| gives him something which he does not have, or else remits 714 II, 0| Father were his, nor did he ever owe anything which 715 II, 0| render payment for what he owes, and yet there is no 716 II, 0| Anselm.. Upon whom would he more properly bestow the 717 II, 0| as right reason teaches, he became man; and for whose 718 II, 0| as we have already said, he left an example of suffering 719 II, 0| his reward. Or whom could he more justly make heirs of 720 II, 0| of the inheritance, which he does not need, and of the 721 II, 0| more proper than that, when he beholds so many of them 722 II, 0| depth of their miseries, he should remit the debt incurred 723 II, 0| Anselm.. Certainly not, if he come aright. And the Scriptures, 724 II, 0| conquer the devil, so that he who had offended by sin 725 II, 0| whatever was demanded of man, he owed to God and not to the 726 II, 1| to remit all debt since he has earned a reward greater 727 II, 1| given with the love which he deserves.~ ~ 728 II, 2| even to the fallen angels, he is convinced by reason, 729 II, 2| by reason, for by reason he has been deceived. And I


1-500 | 501-729

IntraText® (V89) Copyright 1996-2007 EuloTech SRL