Par.

  1 Pre|           For they designate by the word substance that attribute
  2 Pre|           which we designate by the word person.~Whatever I have
  3 8  |          For, indeed, from the very word that we use, saying that
  4 10 |           where these are, no other word is necessary for the recognition
  5 10 |            they cannot be, no other word is of any use for the description
  6 10 |           of these, I say, no other word appears so similar to the
  7 10 |       especially proper and primary word, corresponding to the thing.
  8 10 |          the thought of any another word so like the object, whether
  9 12 |             by the utterance of one word; what conclusion can be
 10 23 |         proper signification of the word of place?~For we often quite
 11 30 |          words than one, but is one Word. ~WHY, then, should I have
 12 30 |          words than one, but is one Word, through which all things
 13 31 |                  CHAPTER XXXI.~This Word itself is not the likeness
 14 31 |          our position regarding the Word by which all things are
 15 31 |            mutable things, then the Word of supreme Truth is not
 16 31 |           is conceived of as in the Word, whose essence exists so
 17 31 |              and according to, that Word, a kind of imitation of
 18 31 |         found.~For, in this way the Word of supreme Truth, which
 19 31 |            clear, then, that in the Word, through which all things
 20 31 |      necessarily follows, that this Word is not more nor less true,
 21 31 |            is seen to approach that Word.~ ~
 22 32 |    expresses himself by a coeternal Word. ~BUT since this is true,
 23 32 |         what is simple Truth be the Word corresponding to those objects,
 24 32 |           the likeness? Since every word by which an object is thus
 25 32 |          object, if this is not the word corresponding to the objects
 26 32 |           we be sure that it is the Word? For every word is a word
 27 32 |           it is the Word? For every word is a word corresponding
 28 32 |           Word? For every word is a word corresponding to some object.
 29 32 |         creature, there would be no word.~Are we to conclude, then,
 30 32 |        there were no creature, that Word would not exist at all,
 31 32 |       itself, perhaps, which is the Word still be the eternal Being,
 32 32 |          eternal Being, but not the Word, if nothing were ever created
 33 32 |         will not be, then can be no word corresponding.~But, according
 34 32 |           Spirit, there would be no word at all in him. If there
 35 32 |            in him. If there were no word in him, he would express
 36 32 |    expresses himself eternally, his Word is eternally with him. Whether,
 37 32 |          other existing beings, the Word of that Spirit must be coeternal
 38 33 |             a single consubstantial Word. ~BUT here, in my inquiry
 39 33 |           my inquiry concerning the Word, by which the Creator expresses
 40 33 |           creates, is suggested the word by which he, who creates
 41 33 |       express himself, then, by one word, and what be creates by
 42 33 |     whatever he creates by the same word whereby he expresses himself?~
 43 33 |         expresses himself?~For this Word also, by which he expresses
 44 33 |            is evidently true of the Word by which he expresses his
 45 33 |       require the existence of that word by which he expresses himself,
 46 33 |             more true than that his Word is nothing else than what
 47 33 |           and what he creates, by a Word consubstantial with himself,
 48 33 |             is manifest that of the Word by which he expresses himself,
 49 33 |       expresses himself, and of the Word by which he expresses the
 50 33 |         compel us to admit a single Word. For the Creator himself,
 51 33 |            them, and yet is not the Word. But, undoubtedly the word
 52 33 |          Word. But, undoubtedly the word by which the supreme Wisdom
 53 33 |            most fitly be called its Word on the former ground, namely,
 54 33 |        vision and this image is the word corresponding to the man
 55 33 |           image, which image is its word.~Who, then, can deny that
 56 33 | consubstantial with it, namely, its Word? And this Word, although
 57 33 |          namely, its Word? And this Word, although of a subject so
 58 33 |        called his likeness.~But the Word by which the Creator expresses
 59 33 |             all, in the same way, a word corresponding to the created
 60 33 |           created world itself by a word corresponding to the created
 61 33 |             To what, then, does the word belong, whereby he expresses
 62 33 |            does not express it by a word, belonging to itself? For
 63 33 |        expresses, he expresses by a word, and a word must belong
 64 33 |          expresses by a word, and a word must belong to something,
 65 33 |        express nothing, except by a word corresponding to himself
 66 33 |           he expresses nothing by a word belonging to the created
 67 33 |      expresses, he expresses by the Word corresponding to himself.
 68 33 |        himself. By one and the same Word, then, he expresses himself
 69 34 |            the created world by his Word. ~BUT how can objects so
 70 34 |           being be expressed by one Word, especially since that Word
 71 34 |         Word, especially since that Word itself is coeternal with
 72 34 |         created by one and the same Word.~ ~
 73 35 |          has been created is in his Word and knowledge, life and
 74 35 |             is established that his word is consubstantial with him,
 75 35 |             in the same way, in his Word. Whatever has been created,
 76 35 |            as all things are in his Word life and truth, so are they
 77 36 |            exists more truly in the Word, that is, in the intelligence
 78 37 |        creatures, this relation his Word also sustains: yet both
 79 37 |      created all things through his Word, did not the Word itself
 80 37 |       through his Word, did not the Word itself also create all things?
 81 37 |             that of which it is the Word. But there is no supreme
 82 37 |        Spirit creates, the same his Word also creates, and in the
 83 37 |          creates, this relation his Word also bears, and in the same
 84 37 |             of the world, so is his Word also; and yet there are
 85 38 |          the supreme Spirit and his Word. For, it is certain that
 86 38 |          Truth and Creator, and his Word is supreme Truth and Creator;
 87 38 |            neither he, whose is the Word, can be his own Word, nor
 88 38 |            the Word, can be his own Word, nor can the Word be he,
 89 38 |           his own Word, nor can the Word be he, whose Word it is,
 90 38 |           can the Word be he, whose Word it is, although in so far
 91 38 |          derive existence from that Word, but that Word from him,
 92 38 |            from that Word, but that Word from him, they admit an
 93 38 |             nor two images.~For the Word, by virtue of the fact that
 94 38 |            of the fact that it is a word or image, bears a relation
 95 38 |            the other, because it is Word and image only as it is
 96 38 |             image only as it is the Word and image of something;
 97 38 |         other. For he, whose is the Word and image, is neither image
 98 38 |         image, is neither image nor Word. It is, therefore, evident
 99 38 |          the supreme Spirit and the Word, although by certain properties
100 39 |                 CHAPTER XXXIX.~This Word derives existence from the
101 39 |            clearly proved, that the Word of the supreme Spirit does
102 39 |             evident, then, that the Word of the supreme Spirit so
103 39 |          the more fittingly may the Word of the supreme Spirit be
104 40 |            truly a parent, and that Word his offspring. ~BUT if it
105 40 |             truly a parent, and the Word his offspring, the more
106 40 |           its parent.~If, then, the Word of the supreme Spirit so
107 40 |          the supreme Spirit and his Word. Hence, it is his property
108 41 |          truly to beget, and to his Word to be most truly begotten.~ ~
109 42 |        truly the Father, while this Word is most truly his Son. But
110 46 |            that the Son is the true Word, that is, the perfect intelligence,
111 48 |              just as the Son is the Word; because the Word is apparently
112 48 |            is the Word; because the Word is apparently born of memory,
113 48 |            it thinks of itself, the word corresponding to it is born
114 48 |       always thought of itself, its word would be always born of
115 48 |      express it mentally; while the word corresponding to the object
116 48 |    remembrance of it, its coeternal Word is born. Therefore, as the
117 48 |             born. Therefore, as the Word is properly conceived of
118 55 |           or offspring? But, as the Word, so soon as it is examined,
119 56 |         said to be begotten, as the Word is said to be begotten.
120 56 |           to be begotten as can the Word; since the Word is the most
121 56 |             can the Word; since the Word is the most true offspring
122 56 |            unbegotten, whose is the Word; since he alone is Father
123 56 |     existence from another; and the Word alone should be called begotten,
124 57 |    expression is admissible, as the Word of the supreme Being is
125 62 |             are thinkers; since the word corresponding to it exists
126 62 |           outside his own mind, the word corresponding to the object
127 62 |    expressed seems to beget his own word, just as when he is expressed
128 62 |              if each begets his own word, when he is expressed by
129 63 |            one Father, that is, one Word, and that from the Father
130 63 |           the supreme Being another Word than that already shown
131 63 |            born of him whose is the Word, so that it may be called
132 63 |       others, and that there is one Word alone among them; yet it
133 63 |            yet it appears that this Word itself can in no wise be
134 63 |            in no wise be called the Word of all three, but only of
135 63 |          image and Son of him whose Word it is. And it is plain that
136 63 |            concluded that this sole Word corresponds to him alone,
137 63 |         than one, but one; and this Word corresponds not to each
138 78 |         three; yet I cannot, in one word, show why they are three;
139 78 |          supreme Being, because the word person is applied only to
140 78 |            rational nature; and the word substance is ordinarily
141 78 |            substance, except as the word substance is used in the
142 78 |             the same sense with the word Essence. Hence, on this