Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
Alphabetical [« »] call 6 called 41 calling 1 can 119 cannot 62 capable 10 careful 3 | Frequency [« »] 133 has 133 other 127 existence 119 can 115 time 113 essence 111 does | Anselmus Cantuariensis Monologium IntraText - Concordances can |
Par.
1 1 | he still believes that he can at least convince himself 2 1 | necessary, but merely that it can appear so for the time being.~ 3 1 | whatever that being is. But who can doubt this very being, through 4 2 | instance. And since there can be nothing supremely great 5 3 | through itself. But, there can be no doubt that, in that 6 3 | through one another, no reason can admit; since it is an irrational 7 4 | degree, than which no higher can be found, our course of 8 4 | an absurdly foolish man can fail to regard such a conclusion 9 4 | anything other than themselves, can there be more such natures 10 4 | excellent, then in no wise can there be more than one nature 11 6 | through another.~But nothing can, through itself, derive 12 6 | cause of good. But no good can be understood as existing 13 7 | four elements, of course, can be conceived of without 14 7 | itself, any lesser being can derive existence, the supreme 15 7 | through the supreme Being, nor can anything else exist through 16 7 | material, doubtless nothing can be more clear than that 17 8 | every one, that the belief can be wrested from no one by 18 8 | no one by argument, and can scarcely be purloined by 19 8 | its source in nothing, who can be convinced, and how, that 20 8 | the present obstacle -- can the statement that any substance 21 8 | before.~In this way, then, we can understand, without inconsistency, 22 9 | creation. For, in no wise can anything conceivably be 23 10| it is recognised that we can express the same object 24 10| this sort of words, nor can there be in the thought 25 11| once, or part by part; nor can he perform the work mentally 26 11| performed. For, though a man can, by meditation or representation, 27 12| one word; what conclusion can be more evidently necessary, 28 12| passed over. But before it can be discussed, I think some 29 13| created. But no rational mind can doubt that all creatures 30 13| of reasoning, I say, it can be proved that whatever 31 14| that as any created being can in no wise exceed the immeasurableness 32 15| CHAPTER XV.~What can or cannot be stated concerning 33 15| expressions, at any rate, no one can doubt that no such expression 34 15| other relative term that can, in like manner, be applied 35 15| then, the supreme Nature can be so conceived of as not 36 15| to which no bodily sense can perceive what, or of what 37 16| regard to attributes that can be expressed in the same 38 16| except through itself, what can be more clear than that 39 16| itself, what truer answer can be given, than Justness?~ 40 16| cannot be justness, but can possess justness, we do 41 17| way that all things that can be said of its essence are 42 17| same in it: and nothing can be said of its substance 43 18| above.~Then, let him who can conceive of a time when 44 20| and at no time.~But what can be more obviously contradictory, 45 20| where and when it exists, can anything exist. Where and 46 21| how the supreme Nature can exist, as a whole, in every 47 21| whether the supreme Nature can exist, as a whole, in individual 48 21| regarding the times at which it can exist.~If, then, it exists 49 21| another place. How, then, can what exists as a whole, 50 21| place, if no part of it can at that time exist in another 51 21| supreme Natures as there can be individual places; which 52 21| individual times.~But, how can anything exist, as a whole, 53 21| propositions are true, how can these latter be possible? 54 21| and always.~For, in no way can it be conceived to exist 55 22| extent or duration no bound can be set, either by space 56 22| what rational consideration can by any course of reasoning 57 22| according to duration -- nor can in any way be contained, 58 22| properties of time and place can, in some sort, be ascribed 59 24| to live, no better sense can be attached to this statement, 60 25| supremely immutable, if it can, I will not say, be, but, 61 25| immutable Nature no statement can be made, whence it shall 62 27| doubtless if any worthy name can be given it, there is no 63 27| compounded of parts, nor can be conceived of as mutable, 64 28| its immutable eternity, it can in no wise be said, in terms 65 28| this ineffable Spirit alone can in no way be conceived to 66 29| nothing at all ever could, or can, exist, except the creative 67 29| through itself. For nothing can be created through itself, 68 29| this expression itself can be conceived of as nothing 69 31| Essence. And I think that this can easily be ascertained as 70 32| since this is true, how can what is simple Truth be 71 32| not, and will not be, then can be no word corresponding.~ 72 32| conceive of itself? But how can it be even imagined that 73 32| itself; since a rational mind can remember not only itself, 74 33| Wisdom.~For, on no ground can it be denied that when a 75 33| is its word.~Who, then, can deny that the supreme Wisdom, 76 33| uniquely important nothing can be said with sufficient 77 33| or his created world he can express nothing, except 78 34| CHAPTER XXXIV.~How he can express the created world 79 34| world by his Word. ~BUT how can objects so different as 80 36| human knowledge. For none can doubt that created substances 81 36| truly than the created; how can the human mind comprehend 82 38| neither he, whose is the Word, can be his own Word, nor can 83 38| can be his own Word, nor can the Word be he, whose Word 84 38| requires that they be two, it can in no wise be explained 85 39| AND this truth, it seems, can be expressed in no more 86 39| more fitting supposition can be entertained regarding 87 40| of parent and offspring can be ascribed to no beings 88 44| be wise through himself, can we thus understand the statement 89 48| remembers itself, nothing can be more consistent than 90 48| child of his memory, there can be no more logical conclusion 91 49| mind is convinced that it can love both itself and him, 92 49| itself and him, because it can remember itself and him, 93 49| remember itself and him, and can conceive of itself and of 94 53| Son one spirit. ~BUT, what can be equal to the supreme 95 53| supreme Being, what inference can be more necessary than that 96 53| supreme Good, and whatsoever can be attributed to the substance 97 54| solution of such a question can, without doubt, be apprehended 98 56| apparent that this love can neither be said, in accordance 99 56| speech, to be unbegotten, nor can it so properly be said to 100 56| be said to be begotten as can the Word; since the Word 101 57| deriving existence from it, can perhaps be no better expressed 102 59| another, that none of them can be proved to surpass another 103 62| Apparently as many words as can be proved to be born of 104 63| appears that this Word itself can in no wise be called the 105 63| separately as plural, so, neither can it be attributed to them 106 64| nothing or scarcely anything can be known by man? Hence, 107 65| if it is ineffable, how can it be such as our discussion 108 65| inference regarding it, which can be reached by the instruction 109 66| clear, then, that nothing can be ascertained concerning 110 66| through which the mind itself can most successfully achieve 111 67| that any rational creature can have been naturally endowed 112 68| else so especially.~For who can deny that whatever within 113 70| creatures, assuredly nothing can be the reward of love except 114 70| the loving soul. For, who can love justice, truth, blessedness, 115 71| contradiction. Therefore, nothing can be more logical, and nothing 116 75| out for it. And this truth can be more briefly and fitly 117 77| the supreme Justice, it can scorn nothing that is just, 118 77| nothing that is just, it can approve nothing that is 119 78| what? For, although I can speak of a Trinity because