Par.

 1 Pre|          It is in accordance with their wish, rather than with my
 2 Pre|        the light of truth. It was their wish also, that I should
 3 Pre|         the modest importunity of their entreaties and by the not
 4 Pre|         contemptible sincerity of their zeal; and reluctant as I
 5 Pre|         with pleasure inspired by their affection that, so far as
 6 Pre|      others, by making copies for their own use, condemned this
 7 1  |        goodness, the very fact of their existence, and the fact
 8 1  |          the fact that in any way their existence is good; and if
 9 4  |           it is nothing else than their very essence itself, just
10 7  |           actual objects, so that their formless, or even confused,
11 7  |          bodies, distinguished by their own forms. -- I say that
12 9  |           had an existence before their creation in the thought
13 9  |          have been nothing before their creation. For, in no wise
14 9  |       created were nothing before their creation, to this extent,
15 10 |         of things, which preceded their creation in the thought
16 10 |         since all other words owe their invention to these, where
17 10 |       objects, which we employ as their own names, in order to signify
18 10 |          supreme Substance before their creation, that they might
19 19 |      nothing so easily demolishes their structure? For, if it is
20 19 |          which, from the force of their whole correlation, must
21 22 |       only whatever is limited by their bounds neither escapes the
22 22 |         time, is bound by none of their laws.~Hence, since inevitable
23 25 |           degree of mutability in their train, while a part do not
24 25 |       which effect some change by their occurrence or non-occurrence,
25 28 |  existence is not yet a fact; and their existence in a transient,
26 28 |          non-existence, so far as their own power is concerned,
27 28 |      being, is it consistent with their nature to exist simply,
28 31 |        beings, but the reality of their being, while created beings
29 31 |       things were created, is not their likeness, but their true
30 31 |           not their likeness, but their true and simple essence;
31 36 |           they exist by virtue of their own being; while in our
32 36 |           in our knowledge is not their being, but their likeness.~
33 36 |           is not their being, but their likeness.~We conclude, then,
34 36 |       truly anywhere by virtue of their own being, than by virtue
35 36 |          being, than by virtue of their likeness. Therefore, since
36 36 |  surpassed by those substances as their likeness is removed from
37 36 |          likeness is removed from their being?~ ~
38 38 | expression which indicates either their essence or their relation
39 38 |           either their essence or their relation to the created
40 43 |       Spirit. For so opposite are their relations, that the one
41 43 |           identical, by virtue of their substance, that the essence
42 44 |           simplicity and unity of their common nature is thus honored.
43 54 |       they are one. For, not from their relations, which are more
44 54 |           more than one, but from their essence itself, which does
45 55 |      CHAPTER LV.~This love is not their Son. ~SINCE this love, then,
46 55 |           is it to be regarded as their Son or offspring? But, as
47 55 |          Son.~Therefore, if it is their offspring, either one of
48 55 |      inconsistent with truth that their identical love should be
49 55 |          identical love should be their son or offspring.~ ~
50 57 |   expression may be used, breathe their love: for, although the
51 57 |      since from both breathing in their transcendent way it mysteriously
52 59 |        The Father and the Son and their Spirit exist equally the
53 62 |        the Father and the Son and their Spirit each expresses himself
54 62 |         Being, Father and Son and their Spirit are always so present
55 63 |           else Father and Son and their Spirit, of whom it is already
56 63 |        the Father and the Son and their Spirit taken separately;
57 63 |           the Son separately, and their Spirit separately, is a
58 63 |          therein expressed except their being? If, then, that Being
59 64 |        the incomprehensibility of their own natural sublimity, they
60 64 |          of explanation in words, their assured certainty is not
61 65 |     something far different, that their meaning suggests to my mind,
62 70 |          to separate them against their will. Hence, the soul that
63 76 |          in Father and Son and in their Spirit equally, and in each
64 76 |      Father and in the Son and in their Spirit, and in each separately,
65 76 |           the Son separately, and their Spirit separately is the
66 76 |          once Father and Son with their Spirit are one and the same