Par.

 1 11|      that he has gathered in his memory from objects known externally.~
 2 32|         human mind could have no memory or concept of that Wisdom
 3 33|      image as I have acquired in memory through my ocular vision
 4 48|        intelligence or wisdom of memory or the memory of the Father
 5 48|          wisdom of memory or the memory of the Father and of memory. ~
 6 48|      memory of the Father and of memory. ~BUT what is to be our
 7 48|      what is to be our notion of memory? Is the Son to be regarded
 8 48|       intelligence conceiving of memory, or as the memory of the
 9 48|  conceiving of memory, or as the memory of the Father, or as the
10 48|         of the Father, or as the memory of memory? Indeed, since
11 48|      Father, or as the memory of memory? Indeed, since it cannot
12 48|          to regard the Father as memory, just as the Son is the
13 48|       Word is apparently born of memory, a fact that is more clearly
14 48|   corresponding to it is born of memory. Hence, it appears that,
15 48|          would be always born of memory. For, to think of an object
16 48|     likeness of that object from memory.~Hence, it may be clearly
17 48|   conceived of as the child, the memory most appropriately takes
18 48|        alone is the child of his memory, there can be no more logical
19 48|         conclusion than that his memory is himself. For not in respect
20 48|         does he exist in his own memory, like ideas that exist in
21 48|          that exist in the human memory, without being the memory
22 48|        memory, without being the memory itself; but he so remembers
23 48|       himself that he is his own memory.~It therefore follows that,
24 48|     Father, so he is that of the memory of the Father. But, regarding
25 48|       The Son is, therefore, the memory of the Father, and the memory
26 48|    memory of the Father, and the memory of memory, that is, the
27 48|        Father, and the memory of memory, that is, the memory that
28 48|          of memory, that is, the memory that remembers the Father,
29 48|     remembers the Father, who is memory, just as he is the wisdom
30 48|    Father; and the Son is indeed memory, born of memory, as he is
31 48|        is indeed memory, born of memory, as he is wisdom, born of
32 48|      wisdom, while the Father is memory and wisdom born of none.~ ~
33 49|        and almost useless is the memory and conception of any object,
34 50|      many things are retained in memory and conceived of that are
35 50|      intelligit). But if, by the memory of the supreme Spirit, we
36 59|          and in the Son; for the memory of the supreme Being exists,
37 59|          the intelligence in its memory and love, and the love in
38 59|        love, and the love in its memory and intelligence. For the
39 59|    conceives of (intelligit) its memory as a whole, and loves it,
40 59|        whole.~But we mean by the memory, the Father; by the intelligence,
41 60|         each taken by himself is memory and intelligence and love
42 60|      most carefully commended to memory. The Father must be so conceived
43 60|       must be so conceived of as memory, the Son as intelligence,
44 60|        separately is essentially memory and intelligence and love,
45 61| intelligence and love as well as memory, and the Son is memory and
46 61|        as memory, and the Son is memory and love as well as intelligence,
47 61|        and the Spirit is no less memory and intelligence than love;
48 61|  understood, that the Father was memory, the Son intelligence, and
49 61|          of any; since he is not memory as begetter, or love as
50 61|          or Son, because his own memory and intelligence are sufficient
51 61|          to him; since he is not memory as begetter, or intelligence
52 62|       object which exists in the memory of the thinker, or which
53 67|         being which, through its memory and intelligence and love,