Par.

 1 10|         This thought is a kind of expression of the objects created (
 2 10|          locutio rerum), like the expression which an artisan forms in
 3 10|         else is it than a kind of expression of these things in his thought
 4 10|     through a concept? But by the expression of the mind or reason I
 5 10|            the first two kinds of expression are in the language of one'
 6 10|         the words of that kind of expression, which I have put third
 7 10|           the thing. Hence, if no expression of any object whatever so
 8 10|     approaches the object as that expression which consists of this sort
 9 10|           be thought that such an expression of objects existed with (
10 11|     analogy, however, between the expression of the Creator and the expression
11 11| expression of the Creator and the expression of the artisan is very incomplete. ~
12 11|           this same most profound expression, just as an artisan first
13 11|          artisan: that the former expression, without being taken or
14 11|        created through the former expression is only what it is through
15 11|           what it is through that expression, while whatever has been
16 11|       that it is not through this expression itself.~ ~
17 12|                 CHAPTER XII.~This expression of the supreme Being is
18 12|     through its own most intimate expression, whether separately, by
19 12|         necessary, than that this expression of the supreme Being is
20 12|         the consideration of this expression should not, in my opinion,
21 15|        one can doubt that no such expression describes what is essential
22 15|           manifest that this very expression, that this Nature, is the
23 22|        time, although the form of expression regarding it, and regarding
24 22|          the latter case the same expression has two meanings, namely: (
25 25|       does not disdain occasional expression in terms of those accidents
26 29|                 CHAPTER XXIX.~His expression is identical with himself,
27 29|          to examine this Spirit's expression (locutio), through which
28 29|        ascertained regarding this expression above has the inflexible
29 29|        careful discussion of this expression by the fact that it is proved
30 29|          was created through that expression, how shall that expression
31 29|        expression, how shall that expression be anything else than what
32 29|         it is impossible that the expression of this Spirit is included
33 29|          was created through that expression; but that expression could
34 29|         that expression; but that expression could not be created through
35 29|     remaining is, then, that this expression of the supreme Spirit, since
36 29|           Spirit. Therefore, this expression itself can be conceived
37 29|         according to this kind of expression, but conceiving of it? For
38 29|        nothing else than what its expression is. But, since it is already
39 29|  altogether indivisible, this his expression must be so consubstantial
40 30|                 CHAPTER XXX.~This expression does not consist of more
41 30|    doubtful, namely, whether this expression consists of more words than
42 36|   comprehend of what kind is that expression and that knowledge, which
43 38|   creators, nor is there any dual expression which indicates either their
44 38|       world; and there is no dual expression which designates the peculiar
45 57|           but somehow, if such an expression may be used, breathe their
46 57|   breathes its love.~But, if this expression is admissible, as the Word
47 62|         if more men than one give expression to some one object in thought,
48 63|         are the same, just as the expression of our human mind is nothing
49 63|          is nothing else than his expression, that is, his ever beholding
50 65|          they are; but by another expression we indicate what we are
51 68|    nothing so earnestly as to the expression, through voluntary performance,