Par.

 1 9 |          supposed) some model, or likeness, or rule. It is evident,
 2 10|         expresses it as does that likeness which is expressed by the
 3 31|       This Word itself is not the likeness of created beings, but the
 4 31|      created beings are a kind of likeness of reality. --What natures
 5 31|        they correspond; and every likeness or image is more or less
 6 31|         object of which it is the likeness.~What, then, is to be our
 7 31|            or will it not be, the likeness of the things that have
 8 31|          if it is itself the true likeness of mutable things, it is
 9 31|           and is merely a sort of likeness of mutable things, then
10 31|          absurd. But if it has no likeness to mutable things, how were
11 31|           the living man, but the likeness or image of a man in his
12 31|        were created, is not their likeness, but their true and simple
13 31|       less true, according to its likeness to the things created, but
14 32|            of which it is not the likeness? Since every word by which
15 32|         mentally expressed is the likeness of that object, if this
16 32|    conceives of himself after the likeness of a rational mind; nay,
17 32|          mind; nay, not after the likeness of anything; but in the
18 32|           rational mind after its likeness. But, if he conceives of
19 33|           it contains the perfect likeness of that Wisdom.~For, on
20 33|       itself its image, after its likeness, as if formed from its impression.
21 33|           attempts to express its likeness, so far as it is able, in
22 33|       that is, its thought in its likeness, as if formed from its impression,
23 33|       expressing itself, begets a likeness of itself consubstantial
24 33|          just as it is called his likeness.~But the Word by which the
25 33|      since it is not this world's likeness, but its elementary essence.
26 33|     something, that is, it is the likeness of something. But if he
27 36|        not their being, but their likeness.~We conclude, then, that
28 36|           than by virtue of their likeness. Therefore, since this is
29 36|         those substances as their likeness is removed from their being?~ ~
30 39|     although they possess no such likeness to those things of which
31 40|        what is born expresses his likeness? For, among other beings
32 40|     unlikeness, it shows complete likeness to its parent.~If, then,
33 48|          itself, formed after the likeness of that object from memory.~
34 55|          by displaying a manifold likeness to its parent; so love plainly
35 55|      contemplates it so evident a likeness to him from whom it derives
36 61| proceeding from another after the likeness of his Spirit, but whatever
37 62|           of thought, but of some likeness or image of the object which
38 63|     itself, because imitation and likeness are impossible where only
39 63|          nor does it exist in his likeness, because it has not its
40 63|          and after whose complete likeness it exists.~One Father, then,
41 65|          in itself, but through a likeness or image, as when we look
42 65|          intimate it through some likeness. For, when I think of the
43 66| approaches it more nearly through likeness. For the more like to it
44 66|        being, through its greater likeness, assists the investigating
45 66|           it most nearly, through likeness of natural essence. What