Par.

 1 10|      mortal animal.~Now, the first two kinds of expression are
 2 19|         the supreme Being, carries two meanings. For, one sense
 3 22|            the same expression has two meanings, namely: (1) that
 4 29|           him, since there are not two spirits, but one. ~BUT now,
 5 29|        with him, that they are not two spirits, but one.~ ~
 6 30|           Nature that they are not two spirits, but one; assuredly,
 7 33|        substance is one, are there two words? But, perhaps, identity
 8 37|        also; and yet there are not two, but one creator and one
 9 38|          be explained why they are two, although they must be so. ~
10 38|         not admit plurality in the two. For although, taken separately,
11 38|           yet both at once are not two truths or two creators.~
12 38|         once are not two truths or two creators.~But although this
13 38|    necessity requires that they be two, it can in no wise be explained
14 38|          be explained why they are two.~For although they may perhaps
15 38|         they may perhaps be called two equals, or some other mutual
16 38|         plurally, as one speaks of two equal lines, or two like
17 38|      speaks of two equal lines, or two like men. For, neither are
18 38|             For, neither are there two equal spirits nor two equal
19 38|        there two equal spirits nor two equal creators, nor is there
20 38|            since there are neither two words nor two images.~For
21 38|          are neither two words nor two images.~For the Word, by
22 38|          be explained why they are two, the supreme Spirit and
23 38|            they are required to be two. For it is the property
24 43|   altogether evident that they are two; yet that which the one
25 43|       obscure mystery why they are two. For, in such a way is one
26 43|     perceive that I have spoken of two; and yet so identical is
27 43|            understand why they are two of whom I have spoken.~For,
28 43|         Father and the Son are not two spirits, but one Spirit.
29 43|         they are not properties of two things, so, what is common
30 43|  separately.~For, as there are not two fathers or two sons, but
31 43|       there are not two fathers or two sons, but one Father and
32 43|           beings, so there are not two spirits, but one Spirit;
33 44|           Father that they are not two essences, subsists, is wise,
34 54|       considered whether there are two loves, one proceeding from
35 54|       likewise as a whole from the two at once.~But the solution
36 54|            and Son at once are not two, but one Spirit; so from
37 54|        from Father and Son, not as two, but as one and the same
38 55|         mother. But that there are two beings which, taken separately,
39 62|    expresses himself and the other two, just as each conceives
40 62| understands, himself and the other two. But, if this is true, are
41 63|    expresses himself and the other two.~For, just as it is an inherent
42 78|           or substances.~For these two terms are more appropriately