Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
Alphabetical [« »] others 13 otherwise 3 ought 22 our 30 ourselves 1 out 5 outside 4 | Frequency [« »] 31 according 31 loves 30 certain 30 our 30 regarding 30 whether 30 while | Anselmus Cantuariensis Monologium IntraText - Concordances our |
Par.
1 1 | bodily senses, and discern by our mental faculties, must we 2 4 | no higher can be found, our course of reasoning reaches 3 4 | through it.~For since, as our reasoning showed us not 4 8 | nothing.~What, then, is to be our understanding of the term 5 10| things themselves inwardly in our mind, whether by the power 6 12| supreme Being. ~BUT since, as our reasoning shows, it is equally 7 15| essence of anything, let our attention be turned to the 8 15| should by all means, as our reasoning shows, be said 9 19| term nothing, and whatever our reasoning thus far, with 10 21| individual times.~If, then, as our discussion has proved, it 11 22| so necessary according to our exposition, and so necessary 12 22| so necessary according to our proof, be reconciled? Perhaps 13 27| there is no objection to our calling it substance.~And 14 31| we express any objects in our mind, that is, conceive 15 31| likeness.~What, then, is to be our position regarding the Word 16 36| differently in themselves than in our knowledge. For, in themselves 17 36| their own being; while in our knowledge is not their being, 18 36| truly in themselves than in our knowledge, in the same degree 19 36| than created substances; if our knowledge is as far surpassed 20 38| although they must be so. ~OUR careful attention is therefore 21 48| memory. ~BUT what is to be our notion of memory? Is the 22 57| Being does not breathe after our fashion, yet the truth that 23 60| this discussion engages our attention, I think that 24 61| truths already disclosed in our discussion. For the Father, 25 62| many Sons, according to our former reasoning, must there 26 63| just as the expression of our human mind is nothing but 27 65| shall whatever conclusion our discussion has reached regarding 28 65| ineffable, how can it be such as our discussion has shown? Or, 29 65| would disprove the truth of our argument; but since it could 30 65| to disprove the truth of our discussion thus far concerning