Par.

1 29|  identical with himself, and consubstantial with him, since there are
2 29|    his expression must be so consubstantial with him, that they are
3 30|     of one? For, if it is so consubstantial with the supreme Nature
4 31|    mutable things, it is not consubstantial with supreme immutability;
5 33|  what he creates by a single consubstantial Word. ~BUT here, in my inquiry
6 33|   what he creates, by a Word consubstantial with himself, it is manifest
7 33|  begets a likeness of itself consubstantial with it, namely, its Word?
8 35| established that his word is consubstantial with him, and perfectly
9 37|     things? For, since it is consubstantial with him, it must be the