Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
thinking 4
thinks 7
third 3
this 359
those 39
though 21
thought 27
Frequency    [«  »]
408 or
406 as
374 which
359 this
342 but
325 through
309 for
Anselmus Cantuariensis
Monologium

IntraText - Concordances

this

    Par.
1 Pre| PREFACE.~In this book Anselm discusses, under 2 Pre| other topics connected with this subject, under the form 3 Pre| form for the writing of this meditation; in order that 4 Pre| objections as occur to me.~This task I have long refused 5 Pre| for the more they wanted this work to be adaptable to 6 Pre| able, I have prosecuted this work within the limits they 7 Pre| limits they set.~I was led to this undertaking in the hope 8 Pre| thing. For I know that in this book I have not so much 9 Pre| their own use, condemned this writing to long remembrance. 10 Pre| man that I have offered in this work any thought that is 11 Pre| no attention before. And this method I knew to be in accordance 12 Pre| if any shall wish to copy this work, he shall be careful 13 Pre| shall be careful to place this preface at the beginning 14 Pre| understanding the matter of this book, if he has taken note 15 Pre| that one who has first seen this preface will not pronounce 16 1 | And, although he could do this in many ways, I shall adopt 17 1 | good, it is natural that this man should, at some time, 18 1 | no knowledge. And if, in this discussion, I use any argument 19 1 | wish it to be received in this way: although, on the grounds 20 1 | necessarily, yet it is not, for this reason, said to be absolutely 21 1 | being is. But who can doubt this very being, through which 22 1 | exist, to be a great good? This must be, then, a good through 23 1 | they themselves are, and this being alone is good through 24 1 | good through itself. Hence, this alone is supremely good, 25 3 | through something. Since this is true, either there is 26 3 | case, they exist through this very power, which is one, 27 3 | all things exist through this very being, which is one, 28 3 | than one, which, without this one, cannot exist.~But that 29 3 | things that are exist through this one being, doubtless this 30 3 | this one being, doubtless this one being exists through 31 3 | other than themselves, and this alone through itself. But 32 4 | course of reasoning reaches this conclusion: that the multitude 33 4 | ranked as inferior.~Now, this. nature which is such, either 34 4 | more natures than one of this sort, and they are of equal 35 4 | more than one nature of this kind. We conclude, then, 36 4 | of all existing beings. This, however, it cannot be, 37 5 | CHAPTER V.~Just as this Nature exists through itself, 38 5 | profitable to examine whether this Nature, and all things that 39 5 | beings derive existence from this supreme Nature. And therefore, 40 5 | supreme Nature. And therefore, this Nature derives existence 41 6 | CHAPTER VI.~This Nature was not brought into 42 6 | first consider, separately, this supreme Nature, which exists 43 6 | it is evident, then, that this Nature is whatever it is, 44 6 | connected demonstration of this matter.~For, seeing that 45 6 | matter.~For, seeing that this my meditation has suddenly 46 6 | ambiguity in my discussion up to this point, I may have the better 47 6 | what it finds here.~That this Nature, then, without which 48 6 | exist before it. Seeing that this Being, then, does not exist 49 6 | through another.~Again: if this Nature derives existence 50 6 | sufficiently clear that this good, without which there 51 6 | not even conceivable that this Nature was preceded by any 52 6 | seems best to conceive of this subject in the way in which 53 7 | other beings exist through this Nature and derive existence 54 7 | Substance, whether because this Substance created them all, 55 7 | all exist through it, for this reason, namely, that there 56 7 | another existing material, this supreme Substance has merely 57 7 | I do not doubt that all this solid world, with its parts, 58 7 | say that I do not doubt this. But I ask, whence this 59 7 | this. But I ask, whence this very material that I have 60 7 | there is some material of this material, then that is more 61 7 | some third being -- but this last, at any rate, does 62 7 | themselves, but through this supreme Being. Hence, that 63 7 | derive existence, since, if this were the case, it would 64 7 | change and corruption. But this it is impious to suppose. 65 7 | everything that is other than this supreme Nature is less than 66 7 | anything other than it in this way derives existence from 67 7 | anything else exist through this Being, except by its creation, 68 7 | be more clear than that this supreme Essence nevertheless 69 8 | is to be understood that this Nature created all things 70 8 | confronted with a doubt regarding this term nothing. For, from 71 8 | being of what it effects. This is so firmly believed, as 72 8 | was created from nothing, this very nothing was the cause 73 8 | from something.~But, if this is posited as a truth, then 74 8 | reasoning had brought me to this conclusion, that all other 75 8 | beings were so created by this Substance, that that from 76 8 | determined not to neglect in this meditation any possible 77 8 | three ways, then -- and this suffices for the removal 78 8 | speak at all. According to this interpretation, to one who 79 8 | it never was created. But this answer is unintelligible 80 8 | not exist at all, as if this very nothing were some existent 81 8 | could be created. But, since this is always false, as often 82 8 | chapter is understood in this sense, that with the exception 83 8 | not from anything; just as this conclusion consistently 84 8 | as he was not before.~In this way, then, we can understand, 85 8 | we understand that when this Being created them, it created 86 9 | before their creation, to this extent, that they were not 87 10 | CHAPTER X.~This thought is a kind of expression 88 10 | he intends to make. ~BUT this model of things, which preceded 89 10 | thinking of the object itself.~This last, then, should be called 90 10 | expression which consists of this sort of words, nor can there 91 11 | according to, and through, this same most profound expression, 92 11 | concept, yet I see that this analogy is very incomplete.~ 93 11 | means has he the power to do this, except by uniting in this 94 11 | this, except by uniting in this idea the parts that he has 95 11 | known externally.~Hence, in this respect, these inner expressions 96 11 | something that it is not through this expression itself.~ ~ 97 12 | CHAPTER XII.~This expression of the supreme 98 12 | evidently necessary, than that this expression of the supreme 99 12 | Therefore, the consideration of this expression should not, in 100 12 | some of the properties of this supreme Substance should 101 14 | CHAPTER XIV.~This Being is in all things, 102 14 | through and in it. ~BUT if this is true -- rather, since 103 14 | is true -- rather, since this must be true, it follows 104 14 | it follows that, where this Being is not, nothing is. 105 14 | created; it is clear that this Being itself, is what supports 106 14 | other things. If we unite this truth with the truths already 107 14 | discovered, we find it is this same Being which is in all 108 15 | concerning the substance of this Being. ~NOT without reason 109 15 | substantially applicable to this so wonderful Nature. For, 110 15 | what end reason will lead this investigation.~As to relative 111 15 | Therefore, it is manifest that this very expression, that this 112 15 | this very expression, that this Nature, is the highest of 113 15 | greatness in any degree. And this truth is clearly seen from 114 15 | seen from the fact that this Nature exists through no 115 15 | case, than supreme --from this fact it is evident that 116 15 | by no means included in this classification. Whether, 117 15 | better, it must be true that this substance is whatever is, 118 15 | great, it is --the less this rational mind would be if 119 15 | For by no means should this supreme Being be said to 120 15 | are, is inferior.~Hence, this Being must be living, wise, 121 16 | CHAPTER XVI.~For this Being it is the same to 122 16 | or how great, but what this Being is. ~BUT perhaps, 123 16 | Being is. ~BUT perhaps, when this Being is called just, or 124 16 | that by participation in this quality, that is, justness, 125 16 | is called just. But, if this is so, it is just through 126 16 | not through itself. But this is contrary to the truth 127 16 | be more clear than that this Nature is itself justness? 128 16 | similarly predicated of this supreme Nature. Whatever 129 17 | be applicable to it. But this impious falsehood the whole 130 17 | supreme Substance is one; so this substance is whatever it 131 17 | such a way that it is not this same thing, according to 132 17 | essentially in any way, this is all of what it is. Therefore, 133 18 | FROM what time, then, as this so simple Nature which creates 134 18 | has a beginning, it has this either from or through itself, 135 18 | supreme good perishes. But this Being is itself the true 136 18 | conceive of a time when this began to be true, or when 137 18 | destined to be; or when this shall cease to be true, 138 19 | before or will exist after this Being. ~BUT here we are 139 19 | before it appears to make this statement, "that there was 140 19 | a mass of arguments, if this nothing so easily demolishes 141 19 | nothing.~But, rather ought this nothing to be resisted, 142 19 | nothing to nothing.~For this one assertion, namely, that 143 19 | meanings. For, one sense of this statement is that, before 144 19 | to fly," I could explain this assertion either in this 145 19 | this assertion either in this way, that nothing, as an 146 19 | which would be false; or in this way, that not anything has 147 19 | after that Being.~If, then, this interpretation of the term 148 20 | been concluded above that this creative Nature exists everywhere, 149 20 | anything at all without it; if this Being itself exists nowhere 150 20 | is no need to state that this is false. Hence, the former 151 20 | exists. But seeing that this is false -- for place and 152 20 | and whenever anything is, this is not true. For, since 153 21 | place or time. ~BUT, if this is true, either it exists 154 21 | individual place and time. This is doubtless impossible, 155 21 | at the same time outside this place.~What exists as a 156 21 | exists. But the absurdity of this supposition is proved by 157 21 | now examine, then, whether this supreme Nature exists, as 158 21 | themselves simultaneous? But, if this Being exists, as a whole, 159 21 | periods of time, it has with this time present, past, and 160 21 | immutable? -- how shall this be so, if that Nature is 161 22 | present, and future.~For, to this law of space and time, nothing 162 22 | Hence, though of beings of this class it is with all truth 163 22 | beings which are not of this class, no such conclusion 164 22 | all?~Seeing, then, that this is the condition of place 165 22 | one --seeing, I say, that this is the condition governing 166 22 | time, and in like manner in this, or that other, place or 167 22 | place or time, then, is this Being properly said to exist, 168 22 | does it exist in terms of this fleeting present, in which 169 23 | since it is plain that this supreme Nature is not more 170 23 | said to be everywhere, in this sense, that it may be understood 171 23 | merely in all places, since this sense is supported by the 172 23 | said to be everywhere, in this sense, that it is in all 173 23 | existing things, than in this sense, namely that it is 174 24 | IT is also evident that this supreme Substance is without 175 24 | understood, when applied to this Substance, to signify eternity, 176 24 | unlike itself?~Hence, if this Being is said to exist always; 177 24 | sense can be attached to this statement, than that it 178 24 | already been shown that this Substance is nothing else 179 24 | and perfectly whole?~For this truth is, at any rate, clearly 180 24 | of beginning and end; and this is proved to be consistent 181 25 | mutable being.] ~BUT does not this Being, which has been shown 182 25 | of accident, since even this very fact that it is greater 183 25 | itself variable.~Whence this conclusion, also, may be 184 25 | non-occurrence, are by virtue of this very effect of theirs regarded 185 25 | called accidents. Therefore, this Essence is always, in every 186 25 | signification of the term accident, this is undoubtedly true, that 187 26 | CHAPTER XXVI.~How this Being is said to be substance: 188 26 | concerning the simplicity of this Nature is established, how 189 26 | the immutable purity of this Being is inaccessible to 190 27 | treatment of substance, this Substance cannot be included, 191 27 | certainly be maintained that this Being is spirit and not 192 27 | more spirits than one of this kind, it must, by all means, 193 28 | CHAPTER XXVIII.~This Spirit exists simply, and 194 28 | all. For, seeing that of this Spirit, because of its immutable 195 28 | that its existence is of this character, it is rightly 196 28 | at some time; and, since this former existence of theirs 197 28 | beings, which are other than this Spirit himself, have come 198 28 | And since the existence of this ineffable Spirit alone can 199 28 | perfect, simple, and absolute, this may very certainly be justly 200 28 | be almost non-existent -- this assuredly may be rightly 201 28 | non-existent.~According to this course of reasoning, then, 202 29 | it reasonable to examine this Spirit's expression (locutio), 203 29 | been ascertained regarding this expression above has the 204 29 | more careful discussion of this expression by the fact that 205 29 | Spirit himself. For, if this Spirit created nothing except 206 29 | impossible that the expression of this Spirit is included among 207 29 | remaining is, then, that this expression of the supreme 208 29 | supreme Spirit. Therefore, this expression itself can be 209 29 | intelligence (intelligentia) of this Spirit, by which he conceives 210 29 | expressing anything, according to this kind of expression, but 211 29 | altogether indivisible, this his expression must be so 212 30 | CHAPTER XXX.~This expression does not consist 213 30 | doubtful, namely, whether this expression consists of more 214 31 | CHAPTER XXXI.~This Word itself is not the likeness 215 31 | But perhaps nothing of this ambiguity will remain if -- 216 31 | Essence is found.~For, in this way the Word of supreme 217 31 | supremely great.~For on this account, perhaps, -- nay, 218 31 | some way alive is more like this supreme Nature, than that 219 31 | cognises anything, is more like this Nature than what is not 220 31 | Essence. And I think that this can easily be ascertained 221 31 | necessarily follows, that this Word is not more nor less 222 32 | coeternal Word. ~BUT since this is true, how can what is 223 32 | likeness of that object, if this is not the word corresponding 224 32 | corresponding.~But, according to this reasoning, if there were 225 32 | which is nothing else than this Spirit, would understand 226 33 | he expresses himself?~For this Word also, by which he expresses 227 33 | more truly it succeeds in this, the more truly does it 228 33 | object itself; and, indeed, this fact is observed more clearly 229 33 | through my ocular vision and this image is the word corresponding 230 33 | it, namely, its Word? And this Word, although of a subject 231 33 | created world, since it is not this world's likeness, but its 232 34 | in themselves, but what this Spirit himself is. For, 233 36 | clearly comprehended that how this Spirit expresses, or how 234 36 | likeness. Therefore, since this is also an established truth, 235 37 | relation to his creatures, this relation his Word also sustains: 236 37 | not simultaneously sustain this relation as more than one 237 37 | which have been created. For this Essence, through no other 238 37 | bears to what he creates, this relation his Word also bears, 239 38 | two creators.~But although this is true, yet it is most 240 39 | CHAPTER XXXIX.~This Word derives existence from 241 39 | supreme Spirit by birth. ~AND this truth, it seems, can be 242 39 | Being. And, to dispose of this comparison with all brevity, 243 39 | If, then, many objects of this sort are without absurdity 244 40 | is sufficient to effect this birth, and the more what 245 41 | impossible to establish this proposition, unless, in 246 42 | truly the Father, while this Word is most truly his Son. 247 42 | Son. But I think that even this question should not be neglected: 248 42 | mother or daughter? And this is certainly a natural fact 249 42 | father than mother, for this reason, that the first and 250 42 | then it is most true that this offspring is not a daughter, 251 44 | clearly proved how false this supposition is.~Hence, there 252 44 | must have from the Father this very power of subsisting 253 44 | impropriety be said to teach me by this very wisdom of his. But, 254 45 | for reasons we have noted, this is true, it is much more 255 45 | essence of the son. For this single explanation proves, 256 45 | with the Father, but has this very essence from the Father; 257 46 | well, not inconsistent with this same assertion. For it is 258 46 | regarding it.~If, then, in this sense, the Son is called 259 46 | have already seen; but in this sense, also, that in him 260 48 | which we have remembrance, this is to express it mentally; 261 48 | wisdom or understanding, this he likewise remembers. The 262 52 | CHAPTER LII.~This love is as great as the 263 52 | himself. ~How great, then, is this love of the supreme Spirit, 264 53 | CHAPTER LIII.~This love is identical with the 265 53 | It therefore follows that this love is nothing else than 266 53 | supreme Being? Therefore, this love is supreme Wisdom, 267 54 | apprehended from the fact that this love proceeds not from that 268 55 | CHAPTER LV.~This love is not their Son. ~ 269 55 | is not their Son. ~SINCE this love, then, has its being 270 55 | to some one being --of this no existing nature allows 271 56 | STILL, it is apparent that this love can neither be said, 272 56 | effect of its cause.~On this ground, then, love, proceeding 273 57 | CHAPTER LVII.~This love is uncreated and creator, 274 57 | Father and Son. ~BUT, since this love separately is the supreme 275 57 | other than itself; since this is true, necessarily, as 276 57 | fashion, yet the truth that this Being sends forth this, 277 57 | that this Being sends forth this, its love, which proceeds 278 57 | expressed than by saying that this Being breathes its love.~ 279 57 | breathes its love.~But, if this expression is admissible, 280 57 | mysteriously proceeds.~And this love, too, it seems, from 281 57 | itself. And, indeed, if this love is actually designated 282 57 | as by its own name, since this name equally describes the 283 57 | Son: it will be useful to this effect also, that through 284 57 | effect also, that through this name it shall be signified 285 57 | shall be signified that this love is identical with Father 286 60 | supreme Being. ~BUT, while this discussion engages our attention, 287 60 | attention, I think that this truth, which occurs to me 288 60 | through his Spirit; and this Spirit were able through 289 61 | some being? and why is not this Spirit the Father of some 290 61 | and the Spirit love.~But this question is easily answered, 291 62 | prove inconsistent with this assertion. It should not 292 62 | and the other two. But, if this is true, are there not in 293 62 | must there be begotten of this substance, and so many spirits 294 63 | and that, nevertheless, this, if attributed to the three 295 63 | expressive being.~Hence, this fact may also be clearly 296 63 | image and his Son.~And in this truth I find a strange and 297 63 | them; yet it appears that this Word itself can in no wise 298 63 | is to be concluded that this sole Word corresponds to 299 63 | words than one, but one; and this Word corresponds not to 300 64 | CHAPTER LXIV.~Though this truth is inexplicable, it 301 64 | the attempt to explain how this thing is. For it is my opinion 302 64 | ought to be satisfied if this reasoning shall have brought 303 64 | enough to recognise that this object most certainly exists; 304 64 | of the self-expression of this Wisdom that the Father begets 305 65 | already been established in this very discussion, namely, 306 65 | sense of these words in this case is by no means that 307 65 | truth discovered regarding this incomprehensible object, 308 65 | face in a mirror. And in this way, we often express and 309 65 | supreme Nature, and yet this Nature itself remains not 310 65 | attempts to achieve through this shadowy signification.~For, 311 65 | transcends all things.~In this way, then, is that Nature 312 66 | be ascertained concerning this Nature in terms of its own 313 66 | being be by nature. Hence, this being, through its greater 314 66 | to the investigation of this Being, so it is not the 315 66 | Being, so it is not the less this same rational mind alone, 316 66 | achieve the discovery of this same Being. For it has already 317 66 | already been acknowledged that this approaches it most nearly, 318 67 | like the supreme Wisdom as this power of remembering, and 319 68 | order that it might love this Being. ~IT seems to follow, 320 68 | voluntary performance, of this image which is impressed 321 68 | good from the lesser; but this power is altogether useless 322 68 | of true discernment.~From this, then, it seems clear enough 323 68 | rational being exists for this purpose, that according 324 68 | creature was created for this purpose, that it might love 325 68 | above all other goods, as this Being is itself the supreme 326 68 | rational being cannot love this Being, unless it has devoted 327 69 | The soul that ever loves this Essence lives at some time 328 69 | must have been created for this end, that it might love 329 69 | been created either for this end, that it might love 330 69 | Being eternally; or for this, that at some time it might 331 69 | voluntarily, or by violence, lose this love.~But it is impious 332 69 | supreme Wisdom created it for this end, that at some time, 333 69 | that it was created for this end, that it might love 334 69 | supreme Being eternally. But this it cannot do unless it lives 335 70 | CHAPTER LXX.~This Being gives itself in return 336 70 | loving him.~But what is this return? For, if he gave 337 70 | useless to itself without this love, is with it preeminent 338 70 | preeminent among all natures.~For this same good, which demands 339 70 | satisfy the soul that desires this supreme Being.~Or, if it 340 71 | The soul that despises this being will be eternally 341 71 | eternally miserable. ~FROM this it may be inferred, as a 342 71 | it is plain enough that this is a contradiction. Therefore, 343 72 | nor the soul that scorns this Being eternally miserable. 344 73 | blessedness or misery, -- of all this I think it certainly most 345 73 | assuredly to believe. And toward this good every man ought to 346 74 | able to train itself in this purpose, if it despairs 347 75 | LXXV.~We must believe in this Being, that is, by believing 348 75 | therefore, profitable to this human soul to believe the 349 75 | may reach out for it. And this truth can be more briefly 350 75 | things which are proper to this aim. For it seems that either 351 75 | without, but within it. And this is indicated more distinctly 352 75 | say, "toward" (ad) it.~On this ground, therefore, I think 353 77 | love, may be proved from this fact alone, that, since 354 78 | three; as if I should call this Being a Trinity because 355 78 | say, for instance, that this wonderful Trinity is one 356 78 | subject to, accidents, and for this reason they more properly 357 78 | word Essence. Hence, on this ground, namely, of necessity, 358 79 | CHAPTER LXXIX.~This Essence itself is God, who 359 79 | not nothing; and that to this supreme Essence the name


IntraText® (V89) Copyright 1996-2007 EuloTech SRL