Par.

  1 Pre|     questions to which he had given no attention before. And this
  2 1  |          ignorance or unbelief, has no knowledge of the existence
  3 1  |    existence is good; and if he has no knowledge of many other
  4 1  |              without reason, he has no knowledge. And if, in this
  5 1  |            I use any argument which no greater authority adduces,
  6 1  |        which we have observed is in no wise refutable, necessarily,
  7 3  |           itself. But, there can be no doubt that, in that case,
  8 3  |       mutually through one another, no reason can admit; since
  9 4  |       perceives, whether he will or no, that not all are embraced
 10 4  |            among these, that it has no superior. For, if the distinction
 11 4  |            that there is among them no degree, than which no higher
 12 4  |          them no degree, than which no higher can be found, our
 13 4  |             more excellent, then in no wise can there be more than
 14 5  |    existence, derive existence from no other source than it, just
 15 6  |          obtains existence.~But, in no wise does the supreme Nature
 16 6  |          such propositions could in no wise be true in the case
 17 6  |            in order that by leaving no ambiguity in my discussion
 18 6  |         Nature, then, without which no nature exists, is nothing,
 19 6  |           But it is evident that in no wise does anything exist
 20 6  |             exist before itself, by no means does it derive existence
 21 6  |          was the cause of good. But no good can be understood as
 22 6  |              without which there is no good, is the supreme Nature
 23 6  |    existence from nothing, there is no doubt that either, whatever
 24 6  |         causes. Nevertheless, it by no means exists through nothing,
 25 7  |      material of all. For, there is no need to inquire whether
 26 7  |        Being. Hence, that which has no existence at all is not
 27 7  |   Furthermore: doubtless that is in no wise good, through which
 28 7  |             the supreme good, is by no means good; which is a contradiction.
 29 7  | contradiction. There is, therefore, no lesser nature which derives
 30 7  |           it derives existence from no material. Hence, seeing
 31 7  |          and derives existence from no material, doubtless nothing
 32 8  |          belief can be wrested from no one by argument, and can
 33 8  |            how could that which had no existence, assist anything
 34 8  |             existence? If, however, no aid to the existence of
 35 9  |             their creation. For, in no wise can anything conceivably
 36 10 |             these, where these are, no other word is necessary
 37 10 |           and where they cannot be, no other word is of any use
 38 10 |          exception of these, I say, no other word appears so similar
 39 10 |             to the thing. Hence, if no expression of any object
 40 11 |         sort of animal, such as has no existence; yet, by no means
 41 11 |           has no existence; yet, by no means has he the power to
 42 12 |             of the supreme Being is no other than the supreme Being?
 43 13 |            it has been created. But no rational mind can doubt
 44 14 |            any created being can in no wise exceed the immeasurableness
 45 15 |           expressions, at any rate, no one can doubt that no such
 46 15 |         rate, no one can doubt that no such expression describes
 47 15 |          this Nature exists through no other than itself, whatever
 48 15 |           that still it shall be in no wise greater or less than
 49 15 |            expressions which are by no means included in this classification.
 50 15 |          rational mind, as to which no bodily sense can perceive
 51 15 |           than any of these. For by no means should this supreme
 52 16 |           that it is just; it makes no difference whether it is
 53 17 |             then, that Nature is by no means composite and yet
 54 17 |         with another, rational; and no one of these, taken by itself,
 55 17 |       supreme Being, however, is by no means anything in such a
 56 18 |         already made plain, that in no wise does it derive existence
 57 18 |              or through nothing. In no wise, therefore, has it
 58 18 |             through itself, that by no means is there one essence
 59 18 |            through something, is by no means identical with that
 60 18 |           nothing, it assuredly has no beginning at all. But neither
 61 18 |        Nature is to have an end, in no way will it have an end.~
 62 19 |            and the same Being shall no longer exist, when nothing
 63 19 |           already established is in no wise impaired by the emptiness
 64 20 |             and at some time, or in no place and at no time.~But
 65 20 |         time, or in no place and at no time.~But what can be more
 66 20 |        never. Again, since there is no good, nor anything at all
 67 20 |       anything at all. But there is no need to state that this
 68 20 |           exist, moreover, there is no existence at all, because,
 69 20 |        nothing else than itself, by no means does its power exist
 70 21 |           CHAPTER XXI.~It exists in no place or time. ~BUT, if
 71 21 |              in any place, there is no part that does not exist
 72 21 |          And that of which there is no part that does not exist
 73 21 |          exist in a given place, is no part of what exists at the
 74 21 |              then, in any place, is no part of what exists at the
 75 21 |        place. But, of that of which no part exists outside any
 76 21 |            outside any given place, no part exists, at the same
 77 21 |         whole, in another place, if no part of it can at that time
 78 21 |            there is in the meantime no good and no existence in
 79 21 |            the meantime no good and no existence in other places,
 80 21 |             Its age, then, which is no other than its eternity,
 81 21 |           that supreme Nature is in no wise composite, but is supremely
 82 21 |        these latter be possible? By no means, then, is past or
 83 21 |      everywhere and always.~For, in no way can it be conceived
 84 21 |            in any place or time. In no place or time, that is,
 85 22 |        which are not of this class, no such conclusion is necessarily
 86 22 |          spatial extent or duration no bound can be set, either
 87 22 |            either by space or time, no place or time is properly
 88 22 |             irrational to say, that no place is its place, and
 89 22 |             place is its place, and no time its time.~But, what
 90 22 |             But, what evidently has no place or time is doubtless
 91 22 |             or time is doubtless by no means compelled to submit
 92 22 |           the law of place or time. No law of place or time, then,
 93 22 |           governs any nature, which no place or time limits by
 94 22 |         from nothing, is limited by no restraint of space or time;
 95 22 |     duration --truth, which regards no greatness or smallness of
 96 22 |           times; but whatever is in no wise confined by the restraint
 97 22 |            governing place or time, no doubt the supreme Substance,
 98 22 |             which is encompassed by no restraint of place or time,
 99 22 |           as a whole, be lacking to no place or time, and no law
100 22 |            to no place or time, and no law of place or time prevents
101 22 |       present, with the past, which no longer is; nor does it pass
102 22 |           which is not yet.~For, by no means is that Being compelled
103 22 |         time -- the Being which, in no wise, includes its own existence
104 22 |             exists with another.~In no place or time, then, is
105 22 |            since it is contained by no other at all. And yet it
106 22 |             in none, because it has no place or time, and has not
107 22 |        every place and time, and in no place or time, according
108 23 |           adverbs of place, yet, by no local limitation, does the
109 24 |          same to exist and to live, no better sense can be attached
110 24 |             its own eternity, is in no wise terminable, and does
111 24 |       consistent with the nature of no created being, from the
112 25 |             the substance undergoes no change?~For, of all the
113 25 |        those accidents which are in no wise inconsistent with supreme
114 25 |      immutability; and yet there is no accident respecting its
115 25 |           that it is susceptible of no accident; since, just as
116 25 |          supremely immutable Nature no statement can be made, whence
117 27 |           can be given it, there is no objection to our calling
118 27 |             it substance.~And since no worthier essence than spirit
119 28 |       immutable eternity, it can in no wise be said, in terms of
120 28 |       former existence of theirs is no longer a fact; and that
121 28 |       ineffable Spirit alone can in no way be conceived to have
122 29 |            cannot be a creature, is no other than the supreme Spirit.
123 31 |            is absurd. But if it has no likeness to mutable things,
124 31 |           nonrational. So, there is no doubt that every substance
125 32 |            Therefore, if there were no creature, there would be
126 32 |            creature, there would be no word.~Are we to conclude,
127 32 |            then, that if there were no creature, that Word would
128 32 |            will not be, then can be no word corresponding.~But,
129 32 |      supreme Spirit, there would be no word at all in him. If there
130 32 |           all in him. If there were no word in him, he would express
131 32 |        Wisdom? Or, if there were in no wise anything but it, of
132 32 |           the human mind could have no memory or concept of that
133 32 |       thought of in connection with no other existing being, or
134 33 |             of that Wisdom.~For, on no ground can it be denied
135 37 |           is the Word. But there is no supreme Essence, except
136 37 |           For this Essence, through no other than itself, alone
137 38 |         that they be two, it can in no wise be explained why they
138 38 |         created world; and there is no dual expression which designates
139 38 |            the one that they are by no means predicable of the
140 39 |          seems, can be expressed in no more familiar terms than
141 39 |           on such terms, that it in no wise derives existence,
142 39 |           created by him, doubtless no more fitting supposition
143 39 |    existence, although they possess no such likeness to those things
144 40 |             uniquely like him, that no child ever so completely
145 40 |        offspring can be ascribed to no beings so consistently as
146 42 |              since in them there is no distinction of sex.~For,
147 42 |            generation of offspring, no other cause is associated,
148 42 |            is associated, and which no other precedes. It is, therefore,
149 44 |      essence of the other, there is no departure from truth; but
150 44 |      through himself.~For, there is no inconsistency between the
151 44 |     supposition is.~Hence, there is no inconsistency between the
152 44 |           once existed, it would be no other essence than its own,
153 44 |            since there is obviously no difference between possessing
154 46 |       acquainted with him, there is no departure from truth.~Most
155 46 |            sense, also, that in him no imperfect imitation shall
156 46 |           of the Father since he is no other than what the Father
157 48 |            his memory, there can be no more logical conclusion
158 50 |            conceive of himself. For no object is loved without
159 51 |       supreme Spirit loves himself, no doubt the Father loves himself,
160 53 |           supreme Spirit. Hence, if no creature, that is, if nothing
161 55 |             like both that it is in no wise unlike them, but is
162 55 |             or mother, differing in no respect, to some one being --
163 55 |            some one being --of this no existing nature allows proof
164 56 |            manifest that love is by no means offspring or son.~
165 56 |           Father and parent, and in no wise derives existence from
166 57 |          created all things through no other than itself; since
167 57 |             from it, can perhaps be no better expressed than by
168 59 |             with such equality that no one of them surpasses another.
169 59 |         Being, but he same truth is no less capable of proof when
170 61 |     intelligence, and the Spirit is no less memory and intelligence
171 62 |          seen, exists in the others no less than in himself --
172 63 |             this Word itself can in no wise be called the Word
173 65 |            words in this case is by no means that in which they
174 67 |      greatest of all beings. Hence, no faculty has been bestowed
175 68 |            that it is known to have no power so important as that
176 69 |          blessedness. ~BUT there is no doubt that the human soul
177 69 |       especially since it should by no means be doubted that he
178 70 |             and most powerful makes no return to the being that
179 70 |             being. For, if he makes no return to the loving soul,
180 71 |          was created. But reason in no wise admits such a belief,
181 71 |          between what is capable of no good and wills no evil,
182 71 |        capable of no good and wills no evil, and what is capable
183 73 |                     CHAPTER LXXIII.~No soul is unjustly deprived
184 73 |        through discussion. But that no being is unjustly deprived
185 74 |          BUT the human soul will by no means be able to train itself
186 77 |            by sufficient love is by no means idle, if an opportunity
187 78 |          Being, which is subject to no accidents, cannot properly
188 79 |        powerful or less good, or by no reason at all, but by the