Tale

 1 Pre   |      Ind by the kindness of the original collectors or their publishers.
 2 GeNote|         complete edition in the original Pali by Prof. Fausböll.~
 3 GeNote|   Pehlevi version of the Indian original (Fables of Bidpai, 'London,
 4 GeNote|        culture contact with the original source. The mere fact that
 5 StNote|      shown to the contrary, the original lender was a Hindu. I should
 6 StNote|    derived from the same Indian original from which our story was
 7 StNote|      Pehlevi translation of the original Indian work, probably called
 8 StNote|      Krohn counts the first the original form, owing to the single
 9 StNote|    somewhat Babu English of the original.~Parallels. - See Benfey,
10 StNote|       the inflated style of the original.~Parallels. - Benfey has
11 StNote|    reproduced in my edition the original illustration of the first
12 StNote|     well to illustrate the Pali original as its English great-great-great-great-great-great
13 StNote|     version is the earliest and original form of the story. The piece
14 StNote|     have failed to preserve the original.~Bidpai~A Brahmin once observed
15 StNote|         is thus shown to be the original of both.~XVI. THE SON OF
16 StNote|     help thinking is the Indian original of a fable of Avian. The
17 StNote|    shall find an earlier Indian original of the fable of the Avaricious
18 StNote|       is probably nearer to the original legend than that preserved
19 StNote|  Knowledge did not exist in the original, but was introduced by some
20 StNote| preserves a reminiscence of the original Indian reading of the tale.
21 StNote|         much concerned with the original explanation of the Jataka