[paragraph continues] A.D., when an ambassador of the Gettaes, then probably under
Kanishka, gave to the Chinese scholar Saian, certain translations of a Buddhist
scripture. In 64 A.D. Meitei, a Hâng Emperor, dreamt of a huge golden god, and
on waking asked his courtiers for the meaning of his dream. It was this Saian,
now a scholar of great repute, who proved able to explain about the Buddhism of
the West, and he was sent next year, with eighteen followers, to the Gettaes,
returning in 67 A.D., with Buddhist images and two monks, Matanga and Horan,
claiming to be from Central India. It is told of them that they were lodged in
the palace reserved for alien subjects in Loyang, the capital - for China, during the Hâng period, claimed sovereignty over the whole world. This palace was
subsequently turned into a monastery, called the "Temple of the White
Horse," and its site is still to be seen, in the suburbs of that shrunken
city of Loyang, which is so rich in ancient
ruins. It is recorded that Matanga painted on the walls of
the palace a stupa which was surrounded by one thousand chariots and horsemen,
and suggests to us the decorated stupas and rails of Sanchi and Amaravati,
which were, of course, the fashion of this age. Of the images they brought,
little is known.
The next monk, Ansei, comes from Arsaie, the land of the
Parthians. He is followed by others from the neighbouring country of the
Gettaes, and an embassy is recorded to have come from India by way of Cochin China, in 159 A.D. These teachers translated those Buddhist scriptures which
belonged to the first phase of the Northern school (positive idealism), and
towards the end of the third century the translation of the Amida-Sutra was
accomplished.
The word amitabha means immeasurable light, and
represents the idea of the impersonal divine - that vision of the grand Eternal
known as Brahman in the
and very different from that version which, by its
philosophic soundness and affinity to the ideas of the Conversationalists, had
appealed to the civilised world of the Chinese Southern, or native, dynasty.
Buttocho, a teacher who is said to have been an Indian
monk, wielded a great influence amongst the fierce and turbulent Hun soldiery.
He was said to be possessed of supernatural powers, and as such was held in awe
by the people, who are said never to have spat in his direction. He was able,
by his personal influence, to stop much cruelty and bloodshed under the Northern Cho dynasty. His pupil Doan went southward, and in collaboration with Yéon,
assisted in the promulgation of the faith in Amida, or the quest of salvation
by contemplation of, and prayer to, the ideal Buddha in the Western heavens.
Kumarajiva, son of a Gettae father and an Indian mother, and supposed to have
been a native of Korsar, was so renowned in his day, that a Northern
emperor despatched an army to bring him as a teacher to China, where he arrived in 401 A.D. He devoted himself to the innumerable translations of
Buddhist scriptures and laid the foundation of that Buddhistic scholarship
which culminates in Chiki of the Tendai Mountains, at the end of the sixth
century.
This history of the long succession of important teachers,
implying the constant flow of a stream of wandering thinkers from India to China throughout the period, raises the interesting question of the means of intercourse.
It appears that besides the sea-route from the Bengal coast by Ceylon to the
mouth of the Yang-tse-Kiang, there were two great landways, which both began at
Tonko in China, at the mouth of the Gobi Desert, divided before reaching the Oxus,
into the northern and southern passes of Tensan, and so on to the Indus.
Embassies probably went by sea.
We have here the clue to a great era,
when North-Western India was a central point between two
empires, and through a living world of communication, travellers, pilgrims, and
traders carried the common culture back and forth. It is probable, too, that in
the Mussulman conquest of India, forcing this immense trade into quiescence at
both ends, we have the secret of the process that has so robbed the Orient of
her prestige, leading the Mediterranean and Baltic peoples to regard the whole
East as but so many victims of an "arrested development."
The artistic attempts of the period are numerous, and some
are on a gigantic scale. But the chief idea of a nation that would admit
Buddhist images to the Taoist pantheon seems to have been the clothing of
Indian religion in the Chinese garb of the Hâng period of art, and this was
done much in the way that early Christian temples and images were constructed,
in the style of Roman architecture and sculpture.
With regard to building, as observed before, Chinese
palaces were changed at once into Buddhist temples in an impulse of
renunciation, only such alterations being made as would meet the new needs. The
stupa, through its evolution of the tee, had, so early as the time of Kanishka,
attained several stories, and when translated into Chinese forms, under the
conditions of wooden architecture, became the wooden pagoda, as known to this
day in Japan. Of these, two kinds exist, one the rectangular and the other the
circular type, the latter still retaining the form of the original dome.
The first pagoda built in wood by Rioken, in 217 A.D., must have been modelled upon the many-storeyed towers that existed under the Hang dynasty,
with the modification of the disked spires, originally a canopy or umbrella,
the emblem of sovereignty, whose number denoted the grade of spiritual rank,
three indicating a saint, and nine the supreme
[paragraph continues] Buddha. Wooden pagodas, built in the beginning of the sixth
century, of which fortunately some descriptions remain, seem more and more to
have followed the Indian method of ornamentation, for regarding them we read of
the great vase at the top, in striking reminder of the description by Gensho
(Hiouen-Tsang) of the ornaments of the Buddha Gaya Stupa, built in the same
century by Amara Singh, one of the so-called "Nine Gems of Learning"
of the court of Vikramaditya.
Sculpture seems to have followed a parallel course. The
Indian type looked at first outlandish to the Chinese mind, and sculptors like
Taiando, in the fourth century, devoted themselves to evolving a new type, by
constant changing of its proportions. Taiando was so eager to have frank criticism
that he hung a curtain at the back of a statue of his, and lay behind it three
years to hear the remark of the public. That there was a distinct school of Chinese sculpture is
manifest from the records of the pilgrim Hoken (Fahian),
who describes the statues of a certain border country as quite Chinese in type,
in contrast with the Indian type of other places, and ascribes the origin of
the style to the influence of a Chinese general, Roko, who had occupied the
territory, though we should consider this to be no more than an enforcing of
the style of sculpture evolved by the Gettae in the Punjaub, whose traces are
seen even in Mathura. Indeed, the existing specimens of this period follow in
the main, as far as we know, the Hang style, in features, drapery, and
decoration.
The most typical examples that we can recall are the
rock-cut images of Riumonsan, near Loyang. They form part of the cave-temples
which the Empress Dowager Ko constructed in 516 A.D. This place is still very impressive in its ruin, as it is not only representative of the
period, but is a perfect museum in itself, containing more than ten thousand
[paragraph continues] Buddhist images, some of the Tâng and some as late as Sung, with
authentic dates attached to them, which are thus of immense importance.
Grottoes follow upon grottoes, all with pointed domes; the sculptures are in
low and in high relief, and the main figures are cut out to be almost free of
the rock.
A Chinese poet who visited the place has left upon a rock
the inscription, "The very stones here are grown aged, and have thus
attained to Buddhahood." The place in itself is beautiful, for below the
precipice on which the Buddhas are cut runs the mad torrent of Isui, and on the
opposite bank is a little temple called Kosanji. The site of the house of
Hakurakuten, our beloved Tâng poet, is still to be seen here.
In the Asuka period, when Buddhism first reached Japan, the Soga family held the most prominent place in the state, as the Fujiwaras and
Minamotos did in succeeding ages. The Sogas remained a
becomes thus a matter of family jealousies between the
Sogas and the Mononobes, hereditary commanders-in-chief of the territorial
army, supported on their side by the Nakotomis, the ancestors of the Fujiwaras,
who, as head priests, or more properly, custodians, of the ancestral rites,
clung naturally to the ancient notions, in defiance of the new religion. The
Otomos, who were hereditary admirals in the Japanese navy, cruising along their
stations on the Korean coast, leaned to the side of the Sogas, at least in the
fact that they stood neutral in the dispute. These disastrous struggles for
power, which ended with the supremacy of the Sogas, were attended by the
never-to-be-forgotten crime of impericide, and several dethronements - a matter
of grave chagrin to the Japanese of the present day - but were otherwise not
unlike the state of affairs at the recent Meiji restoration, when progressives
and conservatives fought out their differences of aims
and opinions, though in a kindlier spirit.
The imperial power, curtailed by oligarchic preponderance
in the Soga period, was unable to veto the claims on either side. Thus when the
Korean king, Meirei, in the thirteenth year of the reign of Emperor Kimmei (552 A.D.), sent ambassadors bearing a bronze-gilt statue of Sakya-Muni, with hangings and canopies
and sundry Buddhist scriptures - addressing a memorial, saying, "Your
vassal Mei, King of Kudara, respectfully sends this vassal of your vassal
Rurishitike, to bear the accompanying image into your empire, that the teaching
may flow and spread towards all your boundaries, according to the Buddha's
command, who commanded that His law should flow Eastward," - the Emperor
was, of course, glad to receive the tribute, but was obliged to hesitate about
accepting it. He therefore put the question to his ministers, amongst whom
Iname of Soga
proposed that it should be worshipped with due rites,
whereas Okoshi of Mononobe, the father of Moria - name dreaded of Buddhists! - and
Kamako of Nakatomi, proposed that they should reject it with its embassy of
escort.
The Emperor decided the matter by entrusting the statue to
Iname, in a spirit of tolerance, and it was placed in his villa at Mukobara for
a time. But the pestilence and famine which raged in the ensuing year gave a
pretext to the enemies of the Sogas, who promptly declared that such disasters
came from worshipping alien gods. Thus they got permission to burn its
accessories and throw the statue into the neighbouring lake.
It appears, however, that before their formal adoption by
the court, Buddhist monks and images were already known in the country.
Shibatatsu, of the Rio dynasty in Southern China, a devout believer, and
grandfather of the celebrated sculptor, Tori, who is the most prominent
and the subsequent assassination of the succeeding Emperor,
who chose to object to the dictation of Wumako. Wumako had then placed his own
grand-niece Suiko on the throne, she being also the granddaughter of the
Emperor. Her long reign, from 593 to 628 A.D., with Prince Wumayado as regent, forms the culmination of the first Buddhist movement, which is sometimes
called from her, the Suiko epoch. Her capital was in the province of Asuka about twelve miles to the south of Nara, where the emperors had resided ever since the
days of Kimmei. Unfortunately, no specimens remain in Asuka itself, and since
the transfer of the capital to Nara, the whole place has fallen into decay. A
few temples here and there, and some marble foundations scattered amongst the
mulberry trees, alone mark its past importance.
The one exception to this is the colossal bronze of Ankoin,
on the site of the Asuka temple, which history reports to
have been cast in the fifteenth year of Suiko's reign. Its
proportions were too large to allow of its entering the door of that great
temple, and this taxed the ingenuity of the sculptor Tori, who was rewarded for
his toils with a high court rank and a grant of extensive estates in the
provinces. The statue has suffered from fire and other casualties, having been
once at least on the point of total destruction. The repairs, too, are of that
unfortunate early Tokugawa period, which so obliterates the main points of the
original that only by arms and sleeves, forehead and ears, can we determine the
actual type of this celebrated statue.
Luckily for us, the Horinji temple near Nara was built
close to the residence of Prince Wumayado, and remains rich in the architectural
and other art specimens of this period. In the Kondo, or Golden Hall, is still
to be seen the Sakya trinity, cast by Tori, under the command of the prince,
bearing the date of 600, and
another trinity of Yakshi, bearing the date of 625, the height
of each, including the halo, being about seven feet. In these statues we find
the same Hâng type that we noticed in the rock-cut temples of Riumonsan more
than a century earlier.
A Kwannon (Avalokiteswara), ten feet in height, made of
wood and lacquer paste, and purporting to have been presented by one of the
Korean kings, stands in the same hall. It may have been made in that country,
or by some of the numerous Korean artisans who flocked to Japan at that time. Another Kwannon, which has been unrevealed to public gaze for centuries, and is
preserved in a remarkable condition, is the Kwannon of Yumedono in the same
temple. From these two we can judge of that idealised purity of expression
which characterises the Hâng type as it appears in Buddhist art. The
proportions are not exactly fine - hands and feet are disproportionate in
size, and the features have almost the rigid calm of
Egyptian sculpture. Yet, with all these drawbacks, we find in these works a
spirit of intense refinement and purity, such as only great religious feeling
could have produced. For divinity, in this early phase of national realisation,
seemed like an abstract ideal, unapproachable and mysterious, and even its
distance from the naturalesque gives to art an awful charm.
But it seemed that the Japanese mind, with its innate love
of beauty and concreteness, was not to be satisfied with abstract types
presented to it by Chinese and Korean masters. Contemporary with these,
therefore, we find a new movement in sculpture, which aims at softening rigid
outlines and bettering the proportions. The typical example is found in the
wooden Kwannon of Chiuguji, a nunnery, founded by the daughters of the prince,
and attached to the same Horinji temple. This statue, which is believed
is an excellent specimen of the Hâng style.
An embroidery, representing the Kingdom of Infinite Bliss,
called Tenju-koku, - into which paradise the spirit of the Prince Wumayado was
felt to have passed, his surviving princesses, with their damsels, working this
tapestry to his memory from a design by one of the Korean artists - still remains
in Chiuguji, and corroborates that interpretation of the colouring and drawing
of the period, which we gather from the Suiko shrine.
Of the architectural remains the shrine itself is a typical
example, and the Golden Hall, Kondo, is, broadly speaking, true to the type, in
spite of having been restored a century later. The pagodas of the neighbouring
temples, Horinji and Hokiji, are also specimens of the same style.
NOTES
The dates which divide Japanese
history having been somewhat generalised for the purposes of the present
sketch, it is thought well to supply the following brief summary in more
accurate form for use in reference.
The Asuka Period. - Lasted from the introduction of
Buddhism in 552 to the accession of the Emperor Tenji, 667 A.D. This era in Japan is much influenced by the great vigour of Buddhism in China, under the Tâng dynasty.
The Fujiwara Period. - From the accession of the Emperor Seiwa
in 898, to the fall of the Taira family in 1186 A.D. This age is characterised by a purely national development of Buddhist art and philosophy,
under the Fujiwara aristocracy.
The Kamakura Period, 1186 to 1394 A.D. - From the rise of the Minamoto Shogunate in Kamakura, to that of the Ashikaga Shogunate.
The Ashikaga Period, 1394 to 1587 A.D. - So called from a place in the province Musashi, which had been the original residence of
that branch of the Minamoto family who held the Shogunate during this time.
The Toyotomi and Early Tokugawa
Periods. - From the
supremacy of Hideyoshin in 1587 to the accession of the Shogun Yoshimune, 1711 A.D.
The Later Tokugawa Period. - From the accession of the Shogun
Yoshimune, 1711, to the fall of the Shogunate, 1867 A.D. This era sees the rise of the
middle classes, and, assisted by
European influence, the advent of the realistic school in art.
The Meiji Period. - From the accession of the reigning
Emperor in 1867 to the present day.
Kwannon. - This word is an abbreviation of
Kwangion or Kwangizai, meaning Avalokiteswara - the Lord who witnesseth. The
name denotes one of the great Bodhi-Sattvas, who refuse Nirvana until the
salvation of the universe is accomplished. Kwannon was originally conceived as
a youth, something like the Christian idea of the angels. Afterwards the form
becomes pre-eminently that of woman and mother. This emanation is
self-manifested in every cry of sorrow, in every sight of pity. Kwannon has
thirty-three forms, representing all grades of existence. "Wherever a gnat
cries, there am I," may be taken as the keynote of the Lotus-Sûtra. He (or
She) represents that satisfaction which comes before renunciation. He is never,
therefore, the giver of Nirvana, but only of the step before salvation. Not the
Buddha, but the Bodhi-Sattva. He is known in Indian Buddhism as Padmapani, the
Lotus-Holder, in contrast to Vajrapani, holder of the thunderbolt.