the vicissitudes of this new age, whose thirty-four years
have passed, bringing each moment some new and greater programme, surround us
with a labyrinth of contradictions, amongst which it becomes extremely
difficult to abstract and unify the underlying idea.
And indeed the critic who speaks of contemporary art is
always in danger of treading merely on his own shadow, lingering in wonder over
those gigantic, or may be grotesque, figures which the slanting rays of sunset
cast on the ground behind him. There are to-day two mighty chains of forces
which enthral the Japanese mind, entwining dragon-like upon their own coils,
each struggling to become sole master of the jewel of life, both lost now and
again in an ocean of ferment. One is the Asiatic ideal, replete with grand
visions of the universal sweeping through the concrete and particular, and the
other European science, with her organised culture, armed in all its array of
differentiated
knowledge, and keen with the edge of competitive energy.
The two rival movements awoke to consciousness almost
simultaneously, a century and a half ago. The first began in an attempt to
recall Japan to a sense of that unity which the various waves of Chinese and
Indian culture - however much colour and strength they might bring - had tended
to obscure.
Japanese national life is centred in the throne, over which
broods in transcendent purity the glory of a succession unbroken from eternity.
But our curious isolation and long-standing lack of foreign intercourse had
deprived us of all occasion for self-recognition. And in politics the vision of
our sacred organic unity had been somewhat screened by the succession of the
Fujiwara aristocracy, giving place in turn to the military dictatorship of the
Shogunate under the Minamotos, the Ashikagas, and the Tokugawas.
Amongst the various causes which contributed
- 208 -
to arouse us from this torpor of centuries may be
mentioned, firstly, the Confucian revival of the Ming scholars, as reflected
in the learning of the early Tokugawa period. The first Emperor of Ming who
overthrew the Mongol dynasty in China was himself a Buddhist monk. Yet he
considered the Neo-Confucianism of the Sung scholars - with its individualism
based on Indian ideas - as dangerous to the unification of a grand Empire. He
therefore discouraged this Neo-Confucianism, and sought also to sweep away the
maze of Thibetan Tantrikism which the Mongols had brought to China, before attempting the regeneration of the native political supremacy. Since Neo-Confucianism
is Confucianism under Buddhist interpretation, this means that the Emperor tried
to revert to pure Confucianism. Thus the Ming scholars returned to the Hâng
commentators, and an age of archaeological research was begun which attained
its culmination in
the gigantic works of the present Manchu dynasty under
Kanhi and Kenliu.
Japanese scholarship, following this great precedent,
turned its gaze backwards over its ancient history. Fine historical works
appeared written in Chinese, amongst them Dainihonshi, or "The
History of Mighty Japan," compiled by the order of Prince Mito, two
hundred years ago. Such books gave expression to a passionate worship of those
heroic personifications of loyalty who had perished, like Masashige, in
glorious self-sacrifice, at the close of the Kamakura period, and the reader
was already stirred to long for the revindication of the imperial power.
A significant dialogue of this period is that in which an
eminent scholar, noted for his reverence towards the Indian and Chinese sages,
was asked by an antagonist, "What would you do - you with your overpowering
love for these great masters - if an army were to invade Japan, with
[paragraph continues] Buddha as its generalissimo, and Confucius as his lieutenant?"
He answered without hesitation, "Strike off the head of Sakya-Muni, and
steep the flesh of Confucius in brine!"
It was this torch that burned in the hand of Sannyo, when
he, a century later, wrought out that epic narrative of the country from whose
poetic pages the youth of Japan still learn the intensity of the raging fever
that moved their grandfathers to the revolution.
A study of purely Japanese ancient literature came into
vogue, led by the master-minds of Motoori and Harumi, to whose colossal works
on grammar and philology modern scholars find little to add.
This led very naturally to the revival of Shintoism, that
pure form of ancestor-worship extant in Japan before Buddhism, but covered long
since, especially by the genius of Kukai, with Buddhist interpretations. This
element in the national
schools under the resident village priests, had laid the
foundation of that compulsory elementary education which was amongst the first
acts of the present reign. Thus high and low became one in the great new energy
that thrilled the nation, making the humblest conscript in the army glory in
death, like a Samurai.
In spite of political squabbles - natural-unnatural
children of a constitutional system such as was freely bestowed by the monarch
in 1892 - a word from the throne will still conciliate the Government and
Opposition, hushing both to mute reverence, even during their most violent
dissensions.
The Code of Morality, the keystone of Japanese ethics as
taught in the schools, was given by an imperial mandate, when all other
suggestions failed to strike the note of that all-embracing veneration that was
needed.
On the other hand, the wonders of
in the discovery of a new world, the birth of a reformed
faith, and the rise of the idea of liberty, was helping to uplift from it the
cloud of mediævalism. And this twofold assimilation it was that constituted the
Renaissance.
Like the great days of the small Italian Republics, when
each struggled to find a new solution of life, and burst to the surface only to
be swept away by the winds of contention, so this Meiji era, foaming with its
bubbles of would-be assertiveness, teems with an unparalleled interest for the
world, though tinged at once by the pathetic and the ridiculous.
The wild whirlpool of individualism, seeking ever to make
its own stormy will its law, now rending the skies in its agonies of
destruction, again lashing itself into furious welcome of any new scrap of
Western religion and polity, would have dashed the nation to pieces in its
seething turmoil, had not the solid rock of adamantine loyalty formed its
immovable base.
whose biennial exhibitions reveal, it is hoped, the vital
element in the contemporary art activity of the country.
According to this school, freedom is the greatest privilege
of an artist, but freedom always in the sense of evolutional self-development.
Art is neither the ideal nor the real. Imitation, whether of nature, of the old
masters, or above all of self, is suicidal to the realisation of individuality,
which rejoices always to play an original part, be it of tragedy or comedy, in
the grand drama of life, of man, and of nature.
To this school, again, the old art of Asia is more valid
than that of any modern school, inasmuch as the process of idealism, and not of
imitation, is the raison d’être of the art-impulse. The stream of ideas
is the real: facts are mere incidents. Not the thing as it was, but the
infinitude it suggested to him. is what we demand of the artist. It follows
that the feeling for line, chiaro-oscuro
half-unconscious, on her pilgrimage in search of the
Infinite, lingering to gaze on the accomplished past and dimly-seen future - a
dream of suggestion, nothing more fixed - but a suggestion of the spirit,
nothing less noble.
Technique is thus but the weapon of the artistic warfare;
scientific knowledge of anatomy and perspective, the commissariat that sustains
the army. These Japanese art may safely accept from the West, without
detracting from its own nature. Ideals, in turn, are the modes in which the
artistic mind moves, a plan of campaign which the nature of the country imposes
on war. Within and behind them lies always the sovereign-general, immovable and
self-contained, nodding peace or destruction from his brow.
Both the range of subjects and the method of their
expression grow wider under this new conception of artistic freedom. The
lamented Kano Hogai, Hashimoto Gaho, the greatest living
master of the age, and the numerous geniuses who follow in
their track, are not only noted for their versatility of technique, but for
their enlarged notion of the subject-matter of art. These two masters,
themselves renowned professors of the chief Kano academy at the close of the
Shogunate, inaugurated the revival of the Ashikaga and Sung masters in their
ancient purity, together with the study of Tosa and the Korin colourists,
without at the same time losing the delicate naturalism of the Kyoto School.
The ancient spirit of race-myths and historic chronicles
has breathed upon these painters, as at every great epoch of revival in art,
from the time of Æschylus to that of Wagner and the Northern European poets,
and their pictures give new fire and meaning to these great themes.
The last masterpiece of Kano Hogai represents Kwannon, the
Universal Mother, in her aspect of human maternity.
[paragraph continues] She stands in mid-air, her triple halo lost in the sky of golden
purity, and holds in her hand a crystal vase, out of which is dropping the
water of creation. A single drop, as it falls, becomes a babe, which, wrapped
in its birth-mantle like a nimbus, lifts unconscious eyes to her, as it is
wafted downwards to the rugged snow-peaks of the earth rising from a mist of
blue darkness far below. In this picture a power of colour like that of the
Fujiwara epoch joins with the grace of Maruyama, to afford expression to an
interpretation of nature as mystic and reverent as it is passionate and
realistic.
Gaho's picture of Chokaro combines the strong style of
Sesshu with the broad massing of Sotatsu. It takes up and re-expresses the
obsolete Taoist idea, of the magician who watches with wistful smiles the
donkey that he has just projected from his gourd, an image of the playful
attitude of fatalism.
Kanzan's "Funeral Pyre of Buddha"
struggling for a new expression, present their grand ideal
vistas, yet to be trodden by the explorers of the future.
NOTES
Sannyo. - Writer of the Nippon-Gaishi and the
Nippon-Seiki, and noted also for his poems on historical and patriotic
subjects. He lived at the beginning of the nineteenth century, and spent many
years in wandering about the country in search of the materials for his
history, which were rendered difficult to obtain by the eagerness of the
Tokugawas to suppress the national consciousness.
Adwaita idea. - The word adwaita means the state
of not being two, and is the name applied to the great Indian doctrine that all
which exists, though apparently manifold, is really one. Hence all truth must
be discoverable in any single differentiation, the whole universe involved in
every detail. All thus becomes equally precious.