Dialogue

 1 Craty|   metaphysical originality, this dialogue may be ranked with the best
 2 Craty|       language put together.~The dialogue hardly derives any light
 3 Craty|       other interlocutors in the dialogue. Does he agree with Cratylus
 4 Craty|          over more than half the dialogue, which he seems so greatly
 5 Craty|    comedy in the form of a prose dialogue? And what is the final result
 6 Craty|          ideas at the end of the dialogue is merely intended to show
 7 Craty|       the general subject of the dialogue.~We must not expect all
 8 Craty|        expect all the parts of a dialogue of Plato to tend equally
 9 Craty|         which is the soul of the dialogue...These remarks are applicable
10 Craty|       subordinate persons of the dialogue, Hermogenes and Cratylus,
11 Craty|         or the Euthyphro in this dialogue like the other Euthyphro,
12 Craty|   Euthyphro, the diviner, in the dialogue which is called after him.~
13 Craty|        agreed. At the end of the dialogue, he speaks as in the Symposium
14 Craty|   seriously. In this part of the dialogue his dread of committing
15 Craty|          over more than half the dialogue. But then, we remember that
16 Craty|      nothing in this part of the dialogue which is either weak or
17 Craty|         as in the main true. The dialogue is also a satire on the
18 Craty|      etymological portion of the dialogue stand to the serious? Granting
19 Craty| evidently the main thesis of the dialogue: What is the truth, or correctness,
20 Craty|        In the latter part of the dialogue Socrates becomes more serious,
21 Craty|        Aegina.’~The place of the dialogue in the series cannot be
22 Craty|      spoken of at the end of the dialogue, also indicates a comparatively
23 Craty|          CRATYLUS~PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: Socrates, Hermogenes, Cratylus.~