Dialogue

 1 Craty|            as we appear to find in a Greek temple or statue; nor should
 2 Craty|            view of the derivation of Greek words from other languages,
 3 Craty| characteristic difficulties of early Greek philosophy, endeavours to
 4 Craty|     acquainted with any language but Greek. Yet he has conceived very
 5 Craty|           very truly the relation of Greek to foreign languages, which
 6 Craty|           because he finds that many Greek words are incapable of explanation.
 7 Craty|       ignorant than any schoolboy of Greek grammar, and had no table
 8 Craty|           synthetical languages like Greek and Latin, which have retained
 9 Craty|          developed into Sanscrit and Greek. They hardly enable us to
10 Craty|              not enter. The ordinary Greek grammar gives a complete
11 Craty|               being understood’ in a Greek sentence is another fiction
12 Craty|          date, and that the study of Greek grammar has received a new
13 Craty|             another will prevail. In Greek there are three declensions
14 Craty|               certainly in Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, we are not at the
15 Craty|          nature of the mind. Both in Greek and English we find groups
16 Craty|             the Latin, if not as the Greek. Nor does there seem to
17 Craty|              the low level of Modern Greek or of Mediaeval Latin. The
18 Craty|              that of either Latin or Greek. In the two latter, especially
19 Craty|            two latter, especially in Greek, sentences are joined together
20 Craty|            less distinctly marked in Greek and Latin than in English.
21 Craty|            in English than in either Greek or Latin. On the other hand,