Dialogue

 1 Craty|       the Euthydemus is a still longer jest, in which the irony
 2 Craty|    occurs, and the offspring no longer resembles the parent, then
 3 Craty|       parent, then the names no longer agree. This may be illustrated
 4 Craty|  conceptions, the organs are no longer able to express them. Or,
 5 Craty| historical stage. Grammar is no longer confused with language,
 6 Craty|        partly because we are no longer satisfied with the vague
 7 Craty|       have used shorter, others longer words or cries: they may
 8 Craty|       to leave behind us. We no longer divide languages into synthetical
 9 Craty|   inscrutable to us. We need no longer discuss whether philology
10 Craty|     omitted because they are no longer needed; and the omission
11 Craty|         kind, in which it is no longer true to say that a particular
12 Craty|         retire when they are no longer needed. Language equally
13 Craty|         lacunae which can be no longer filled up, and often becoming
14 Craty|        point at which it can no longer be profitably studied. But
15 Craty|        entire reality, would no longer be an image. Let us suppose
16 Craty|      insist that an image is no longer an image when something
17 Craty|    correctness of names, and no longer maintain that a name is