Dialogue

 1 Lache|        that such an art is not knowledge, and cannot be of any value,
 2 Lache|  defined to be intelligence or knowledge of the terrible; and courage
 3 Lache|      future, and therefore the knowledge of the terrible is a knowledge
 4 Lache| knowledge of the terrible is a knowledge of the future. But there
 5 Lache|    future. But there can be no knowledge of future good or evil separated
 6 Lache|       or evil separated from a knowledge of the good and evil of
 7 Lache|     Courage, therefore, is the knowledge of good and evil generally.
 8 Lache|  generally. But he who has the knowledge of good and evil generally,
 9 Lache|      doctrine, that courage is knowledge. This is explained to mean
10 Lache|      This is explained to mean knowledge of things terrible in the
11 Lache|       Socrates denies that the knowledge of the future is separable
12 Lache|  present; in other words, true knowledge is not that of the soothsayer
13 Lache|       the philosopher. And all knowledge will thus be equivalent
14 Lache|        and unity of virtue and knowledge, we arrive at no distinct
15 Lache|      are never harmonized. The knowledge which in the Protagoras
16 Lache|    courage is inseparable from knowledge, and yet (3) is based on
17 Lache|  difficulty in seeing that the knowledge and practice of other military
18 Lache|       Nicias, that any kind of knowledge is not to be learned; for
19 Lache|     not to be learned; for all knowledge appears to be a good: and
20 Lache|    arms is really a species of knowledge, then it ought to be learned;
21 Lache|    deceivers only; or if it be knowledge, but not of a valuable sort,
22 Lache|      good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers?~MELESIAS:
23 Lache|       is any one of us who has knowledge of that about which we are
24 Lache|   present we have in view some knowledge, of which the end is the
25 Lache|    been confident in their own knowledge, they would never have spoken
26 Lache|  Socrates avers that he has no knowledge of the matter—he is unable
27 Lache|      As to Socrates, I have no knowledge of his words, but of old,
28 Lache|   whether we have a sufficient knowledge of a part; the enquiry will
29 Lache|    Aeneas himself, as having a knowledge of fear or flight, and calls
30 Lache|    cavalry endures, having the knowledge of horsemanship, is not
31 Lache|        endures, having no such knowledge?~LACHES: So I should say.~
32 Lache|       he who endures, having a knowledge of the use of the sling,
33 Lache|     endures, not having such a knowledge?~LACHES: True.~SOCRATES:
34 Lache|      similar action, having no knowledge of diving, or the like,
35 Lache|       than those who have this knowledge?~LACHES: Why, Socrates,
36 Lache|     SOCRATES: But what is this knowledge then, and of what?~LACHES:
37 Lache|     what is the nature of this knowledge or wisdom.~NICIAS: I mean
38 Lache|    Laches, that courage is the knowledge of that which inspires fear
39 Lache|    other craftsmen, who have a knowledge of that which inspires them
40 Lache|       see that the physician’s knowledge only extends to the nature
41 Lache|     affirm that courage is the knowledge of the grounds of hope and
42 Lache|     And not every man has this knowledge; the physician and the soothsayer
43 Lache|  doctrine, that courage is the knowledge of the grounds of fear and
44 Lache|       agree.~SOCRATES: And the knowledge of these things you call
45 Lache|   notion that there is not one knowledge or science of the past,
46 Lache|      friend, is, as you say, a knowledge of the fearful and of the
47 Lache|        courage is not only the knowledge of the hopeful and the fearful,
48 Lache|       are very much in want of knowledge.~LACHES: You are a philosopher,
49 Lache|      conversation that I had a knowledge which Nicias and Laches