Dialogue

 1  Meno|        desires to include in his philosophy every aspect of human life;
 2  Meno|         suggenous ouses). Modern philosophy says that all things in
 3  Meno|          two opposite aspects of philosophy. But at the moment when
 4  Meno|          the second stage of his philosophy, sought to find the nature
 5  Meno|          which in the history of philosophy has had many names and taken
 6  Meno|          seriously, as a part of philosophy, but as an innocent recreation (
 7  Meno| universal ideas, what becomes of philosophy? (Parmenides.) In the Sophist
 8  Meno|    abridgement of the history of philosophy (Soph.), is any mention
 9  Meno|       final form of the Platonic philosophy, so far as can be gathered
10  Meno|         which later theology and philosophy have made between them.
11  Meno|      body.~The stream of ancient philosophy in the Alexandrian and Roman
12  Meno|        not the same with ancient philosophy. There is a great deal in
13  Meno|        is a great deal in modern philosophy which is inspired by ancient.
14  Meno|         There is much in ancient philosophy which was ‘born out of due
15  Meno|         To the fathers of modern philosophy, their own thoughts appeared
16  Meno|          to theology and natural philosophy, and for a time maintained
17  Meno|        than the differences. All philosophy, even that part of it which
18  Meno|     forwards went backwards from philosophy to psychology, from ideas
19  Meno|         of the first problems of philosophy.~Plato also left behind
20  Meno|         birth of the early Greek philosophy, and were the only part
21  Meno|        reasoning process.~Modern philosophy, like ancient, begins with
22  Meno|        into them. Unlike ancient philosophy, it has been unaffected
23  Meno|         the principle of ancient philosophy which is most apparent in
24  Meno|      form and substance of their philosophy is discernible in both of
25  Meno|       the first period of modern philosophy, that having begun (like
26  Meno|          his relation to ancient philosophy is his successor Spinoza,
27  Meno|          the form of the Eleatic philosophy. Like Parmenides, he is
28  Meno|        the limits of the Eleatic philosophy. The famous theorem of Spinoza, ‘
29  Meno|     which defaced the garment of philosophy have been stripped off,
30  Meno|         talking to herself.’ The philosophy of Berkeley is but the transposition
31  Meno|          to David Hume, of whose philosophy the central principle is
32  Meno|      crude and unmeaning as this philosophy is, it exercised a great
33  Meno|    language or of the history of philosophy. Hume’s paradox has been
34  Meno|        could not be refuted by a philosophy such as Kant’s, in which,
35  Meno|        belongs to the infancy of philosophy; in modern times it would
36  Meno|       trace them in language, in philosophy, in mythology, in poetry,
37  Meno|          students of theology or philosophy have sufficiently reflected
38  Meno|       how quickly the bloom of a philosophy passes away; or how hard
39  Meno|       are seeking to express the philosophy of one age in the terms
40  Meno|        day schools or systems of philosophy which have once been famous
41  Meno|         down into the history of philosophy. It is a method which does