Dialogue

 1 Parme|        The date is uncertain; the relation to the other writings of
 2 Parme|     inconsistent with Plato’s own relation to the Eleatics. For of
 3 Parme|           True; and therefore any relation in these ideas is a relation
 4 Parme|      relation in these ideas is a relation which concerns themselves
 5 Parme|         to do with the particular relation of our slave to us.—Do you
 6 Parme|      visible objects, but only in relation to ideas.’ ‘Yes; because
 7 Parme|      things, in themselves and in relation to one another, to individuals
 8 Parme|  connexion, or to ascertain their relation to phenomena. Still he affirms
 9 Parme|          other. For everything in relation to every other thing is
10 Parme|       same nor other, then in the relation of part to a whole or whole
11 Parme|      cannot be a part or whole in relation to one, nor other than one;
12 Parme|       alike in that they have the relation of otherness; and likeness
13 Parme|   relations, has no difference of relation, and is therefore not unlike,
14 Parme|         there will be no small in relation to which it is great. And
15 Parme|           true also of the one in relation to itself: one will be equal
16 Parme|          and likewise nothing, in relation to one and to the others.~
17 Parme|         or other, or attribute or relation, or now or hereafter or
18 Parme|            and difference implies relation, not to the one, which is
19 Parme|        although having a limit in relation to itself and to other particles,
20 Parme|            one and the others, in relation to themselves and to one
21 Parme|         now everything—multitude, relation, place, time, transition.
22 Parme|       older and younger: (11) The relation between two terms is regarded
23 Parme|          the dialogue; 2ndly, the relation of the Parmenides to the
24 Parme|        that ideas were capable of relation. The fact that contradictory
25 Parme|           was no inquiry into the relation of language and thought,
26 Parme|            How can we imagine His relation to the world or to ourselves?
27 Parme|        ideas are what they are in relation to one another, their essence
28 Parme|        essence is determined by a relation among themselves, and has
29 Parme|           nothing absolute in the relation between them, which is simply
30 Parme|           them, which is simply a relation of one man to another. But
31 Parme|        the ideas are not valid in relation to human things; nor human
32 Parme|       things; nor human things in relation to them; the relations of
33 Parme|       consequences to the many in relation to themselves and to the
34 Parme|        the one, and to the one in relation to itself and the many,
35 Parme|         one and the many in their relation to themselves and to each
36 Parme|           and to other things, in relation both to themselves and to
37 Parme|       look at the consequences in relation to the thing itself, and
38 Parme|          you must look at them in relation to themselves and to anything
39 Parme|        same, nor other, either in relation to itself or other?~No.~
40 Parme|         admits of no attribute or relation?~Of course not.~Then there
41 Parme| affections.~How so?~Everything in relation to every other thing, is
42 Parme|       same nor other, then in the relation of a part to a whole, or
43 Parme|         Since it is not a part in relation to itself it cannot be related
44 Parme|        nor a whole, nor a part in relation to itself, must it not be
45 Parme|       that the one, being in this relation to the not-one, is the same
46 Parme|    exceeding or being exceeded in relation to the one, but only in
47 Parme|           to the one, but only in relation to one another; nor will
48 Parme|          will be true also of the relation of the one to itself; having
49 Parme|         the same will hold of its relation to other things; inasmuch
50 Parme|      older will become younger in relation to that other than which
51 Parme|         than they were before, in relation to the one.~Certainly.~Then
52 Parme|        the others are in the same relation to the one, because they
53 Parme|          be something which is in relation to it and belongs to it?~
54 Parme|       will be in the same case in relation to the other changes, when
55 Parme|         parts, as we affirm, have relation to a whole?~So we say.~And
56 Parme|         the parts have a limit in relation to the whole and to each
57 Parme|           other, and the whole in relation to the parts.~Just so.~The
58 Parme|       gives to them limitation in relation to one another; whereas
59 Parme|         and also nothing, both in relation to itself and to other things.~
60 Parme|         something and partakes of relation to ‘that,’ and ‘this,’ and ‘
61 Parme|           will have unlikeness in relation to the others, for the others
62 Parme|         something of existence in relation to not-being.’) were to
63 Parme|         nor difference, either in relation to itself or to others?~
64 Parme|         the same, or different in relation to it?~They cannot.~Nor
65 Parme|        appears to have a limit in relation to itself and other.~How
66 Parme|        not, one and the others in relation to themselves and one another,