Dialogue

 1 Parme|        within the range of human knowledge; and you cannot disprove
 2 Parme|        Perfectly.’ ‘And absolute knowledge in the same way corresponds
 3 Parme|        and being, and particular knowledge to particular truth and
 4 Parme|        And there is a subjective knowledge which is of subjective truth,
 5 Parme|         must admit that absolute knowledge is the most exact knowledge,
 6 Parme|      knowledge is the most exact knowledge, which we must therefore
 7 Parme|           God, having this exact knowledge, can have no knowledge of
 8 Parme|     exact knowledge, can have no knowledge of human things, as we have
 9 Parme|         the other:—the gods have knowledge and authority in their world
10 Parme|        surely, to deprive God of knowledge is monstrous.’—‘These are
11 Parme|   existence, or are beyond human knowledge.’ ‘There I agree with you,’
12 Parme|      more under the attribute of knowledge than we do, he was more
13 Parme|      proposition implies at once knowledge and difference. Thus ‘one’
14 Parme|        hereafter or formerly, or knowledge or opinion or perception
15 Parme| Megarians and Cynics were making knowledge impossible, he takes their ‘
16 Parme|           and the error pervades knowledge far and wide. In the beginning
17 Parme|         to supply in an age when knowledge was a shadow of a name only.
18 Parme|   contradiction and the unity of knowledge are asserted; in the later
19 Parme|          within the range of our knowledge. But into the origin of
20 Parme|         man of great ability and knowledge, and is willing to follow
21 Parme|       your meaning.~And will not knowledge—I mean absolute knowledge—
22 Parme|        knowledge—I mean absolute knowledge—answer to absolute truth?~
23 Parme|        And each kind of absolute knowledge will answer to each kind
24 Parme|     absolute being?~Yes.~But the knowledge which we have, will answer
25 Parme|          and again, each kind of knowledge which we have, will be a
26 Parme|         which we have, will be a knowledge of each kind of being which
27 Parme|          by the absolute idea of knowledge?~Yes.~And we have not got
28 Parme|         have not got the idea of knowledge?~No.~Then none of the ideas
29 Parme|        have no share in absolute knowledge?~I suppose not.~Then the
30 Parme|       you not say, that absolute knowledge, if there is such a thing,
31 Parme|         must be a far more exact knowledge than our knowledge; and
32 Parme|         exact knowledge than our knowledge; and the same of beauty
33 Parme|        participation in absolute knowledge, no one is more likely than
34 Parme|          to have this most exact knowledge?~Certainly.~But then, will
35 Parme|        will God, having absolute knowledge, have a knowledge of human
36 Parme|       absolute knowledge, have a knowledge of human things?~Why not?~
37 Parme|   perfect authority, and perfect knowledge, his authority cannot rule
38 Parme|          cannot rule us, nor his knowledge know us, or any human thing;
39 Parme|      extend to the gods, nor our knowledge know anything which is divine,
40 Parme|      Socrates, to deprive God of knowledge is monstrous.~These, Socrates,
41 Parme|     perception, nor opinion, nor knowledge of it?~Clearly not.~Then
42 Parme|          this moment opinion and knowledge and perception of the one,
43 Parme|        one, there is opinion and knowledge and perception of it?~Quite
44 Parme|         would appear, there is a knowledge of it, or the very meaning
45 Parme|         belongs to it as well as knowledge; for in speaking of the
46 Parme|      present, or future. Nor can knowledge, or opinion, or perception,