Dialogue

 1 Parme|         follow. ‘But must not the thought be of something which is
 2 Parme|          all things think? Or can thought be without thought?’ ‘I
 3 Parme|         Or can thought be without thought?’ ‘I acknowledge the unmeaningness
 4 Parme|           may be supposed to have thought more than he said, or was
 5 Parme|         fitness as instruments of thought to express facts.~Socrates
 6 Parme|          subtlety of language and thought.~But the realism of ancient
 7 Parme|        language in the process of thought. No such perplexity could
 8 Parme|           at first recognize that thought, like digestion, will go
 9 Parme|        here are many subjects for thought, and that from these and
10 Parme|         well, and trembled at the thought of them.~The argument has
11 Parme|       potent instruments of human thought.~The processes by which
12 Parme|         may be made a calculus of thought. It exaggerates one side
13 Parme|          any way an assistance to thought, or, like some other logical
14 Parme| coincidence of ancient and modern thought.~IV. The one and the many
15 Parme|         Parmenides may still have thought that ‘Being was,’ just as
16 Parme|         are applied to objects of thought or objects of sense—to number,
17 Parme|         of the stumblingblocks of thought which beset his contemporaries.
18 Parme|    exercised a greater power over thought. There is a natural realism
19 Parme|       progress and development of thought. He does not say with Bacon, ‘
20 Parme|    philosophy. The instruments of thought must first be forged, that
21 Parme|          relation of language and thought, and the metaphysical imagination
22 Parme|          necessary place in human thought. Without them we could have
23 Parme|        new universal language; in thought as in speech, we are dependent
24 Parme|      introduce into one sphere of thought associations which belong
25 Parme|           cannot by any effort of thought or exertion of faith be
26 Parme|           the conditions of human thought. To the old belief in Him
27 Parme|          was speaking, Pythodorus thought that Parmenides and Zeno
28 Parme|          Impossible, he said.~The thought must be of something?~Yes.~
29 Parme|       single something, which the thought recognizes as attaching
30 Parme|          are thoughts but have no thought?~The latter view, Parmenides,
31 Parme|           reference to objects of thought, and to what may be called