Dialogue

 1 Parme|      others as relative to the human mind, existing in and derived
 2 Parme|         Yes,’ he said. ‘And of human beings like ourselves, of
 3 Parme|        not within the range of human knowledge; and you cannot
 4 Parme|       can have no knowledge of human things, as we have divided
 5 Parme|       existence, or are beyond human knowledge.’ ‘There I agree
 6 Parme|       bridge the chasm between human truth and absolute truth,
 7 Parme| separating the divine from the human, as two spheres which had
 8 Parme|     more potent instruments of human thought.~The processes by
 9 Parme|      be the destruction of the human mind. The true answer to
10 Parme|       back into a state of the human mind in which Unity and
11 Parme|  philosophy this correction of human ideas was even more necessary
12 Parme|    part,’ a necessary place in human thought. Without them we
13 Parme|      which have distracted the human mind for ages. Mankind have
14 Parme|        the Greek ousia.~So the human mind makes the reflection
15 Parme|       intelligent cause like a human agent—nor an individual,
16 Parme|       of Him is limited by the human faculties. We cannot by
17 Parme|   subject to the conditions of human thought. To the old belief
18 Parme|   ourselves; a mind, but not a human mind; a cause, but not a
19 Parme|       they are relative to the human mind and to one another.
20 Parme|   rooted in history and in the human mind.~
21 Parme|     from us and from all other human creatures, or of fire and
22 Parme| knowledge, have a knowledge of human things?~Why not?~Because,
23 Parme|       not valid in relation to human things; nor human things
24 Parme|  relation to human things; nor human things in relation to them;
25 Parme|      knowledge know us, or any human thing; just as our authority