Dialogue

 1 Parme| psychological theory falls very far short of the infinite subtlety
 2 Parme|      their connexion falls very far short of the Hegelian identity
 3 Parme|      and the others. Again, how far can one touch itself and
 4 Parme|       own doctrine of Ideas, is far from denying that some doctrine
 5 Parme|        error pervades knowledge far and wide. In the beginning
 6 Parme|    cause’ and ‘effect’ are very far from representing to us
 7 Parme|         word ‘substance’ we are far from supposing that there
 8 Parme|      that He is not. Yet we are far from saying that we know
 9 Parme|         and manner like; and so far as they participate in unlikeness
10 Parme|         was saying, I should be far more amazed if any one found
11 Parme|      like the individual, in so far as the individual is a resemblance
12 Parme|         such a thing, must be a far more exact knowledge than
13 Parme|   unlike the others; like in so far as it is other, and unlike
14 Parme|         other, and unlike in so far as it is the same.~Yes,
15 Parme|   another argument.~What?~In so far as it is affected in the
16 Parme|      unlike, is like; but in so far as it is affected by other
17 Parme|   itself?~Of course.~Again, how far can the one touch or not
18 Parme|        other things?~Yes.~In so far as it is in other things
19 Parme|         other things, but in so far as it is in itself it would
20 Parme|        time, must it not, in as far as it is one, at times partake
21 Parme|     partake of being, and in as far as it is not one, at times
22 Parme|       itself, will not they, as far as we see them, be unlimited
23 Parme|  anything which is moved, in so far as it is moved, is no longer
24 Parme|        any way?~No.~Then, in so far as the one that is not is
25 Parme|        it is altered, but in so far as it is not moved, it is