Dialogue

 1 Parme|            may certainly apply the words in which he himself describes
 2 Parme|            the mere recital of the words spoken, the observations
 3 Parme|         trivial to us, because the words to which they relate have
 4 Parme| straw-splitting, or legerdemain of words. Yet there was a power in
 5 Parme|         not the same with one; the words ‘being’ and ‘one’ have different
 6 Parme|            something known, or the words would be unintelligible;
 7 Parme|        existence of the many: (12) Words are used through long chains
 8 Parme|          be deduced from them. The words ‘one,’ ‘other,’ ‘being,’ ‘
 9 Parme|            were more bound up with words; and words when once presented
10 Parme|           bound up with words; and words when once presented to the
11 Parme|           the missing link between words and things. The famous dispute
12 Parme|   new-fangled forms; while similar words, such as development, evolution,
13 Parme|          use of them, or, in other words, they were only applicable
14 Parme|         roused to the utmost about words of which they could have
15 Parme|          class of disputes; as the words substance, nature, person,
16 Parme|            them from examining the words themselves. Either the effort
17 Parme|            To have the true use of words we must compare them with
18 Parme| understanding about the meaning of words; because we know that the
19 Parme|         the past. We know that the words ‘cause’ and ‘effect’ are
20 Parme|            maker or artificer. The words which we use are imperfect
21 Parme|          feelings in the following words:—~Socrates, he said, I admire
22 Parme|           through what an ocean of words I have to wade at my time
23 Parme|            the very meaning of the words, ‘if one is not,’ would
24 Parme|          question.~Yes.~Do not the words ‘is not’ signify absence