Dialogue

 1 Parme|       affected to decline the great argument, on which, as Zeno knew
 2 Parme|           and each division of your argument is intended to elicit a
 3 Parme|           of a given statement.~The argument which follows is the most
 4 Parme|           take a living part in the argument; he is only required to
 5 Parme|            the thought of them.~The argument has two divisions: There
 6 Parme|       infinite subdivision: (4) The argument often proceeds ‘a dicto
 7 Parme|            10) In some parts of the argument the abstraction is so rarefied
 8 Parme|         used through long chains of argument, sometimes loosely, sometimes
 9 Parme|            geometrical figures.~The argument is a very curious piece
10 Parme|        fallacious, but ‘whither the argument blows’ he follows.~III.
11 Parme|           other, and long trains of argument are carried out with a sort
12 Parme|           first thesis of the first argument might be read over again,
13 Parme|        astonished. This part of the argument appears to be treated by
14 Parme|             successive steps of the argument; but still they gave the
15 Parme|             not in any time?~So the argument shows.~Well, but do not
16 Parme|        would already be; but if the argument is to be trusted, the one
17 Parme|           it is the same.~Yes, that argument may be used.~And there is
18 Parme|          used.~And there is another argument.~What?~In so far as it is
19 Parme| simultaneous; and according to this argument the one will be neither
20 Parme|           according to the previous argument the one will be older and
21 Parme|             Certainly.~And the same argument holds of each part, for
22 Parme|          Then may we not sum up the argument in a word and say truly: