Dialogue

 1 Parme| illustrated, both in ancient and modern times, and in none of them
 2 Parme|       which naturally occur to a modern student of philosophy. Many
 3 Parme| Universals would be spoken of in modern books. Indeed, there are
 4 Parme|        also of dialectic, or, in modern phraseology, of metaphysics
 5 Parme|      most familiar principles of modern philosophy, that in the
 6 Parme|       received their solution in modern philosophy.~The first difficulty
 7 Parme|  perplexity could ever trouble a modern metaphysician, any more
 8 Parme|          to confuse ancient with modern philosophy. We need not
 9 Parme|         said, in the language of modern philosophy: ‘Being is not
10 Parme|         which have reappeared in modern philosophy, e.g. the bare
11 Parme|      similar antinomies have led modern philosophers to deny the
12 Parme|      bears a resemblance to some modern speculations, in which an
13 Parme|       coincidence of ancient and modern thought.~IV. The one and
14 Parme|          an idea of nothing?’ In modern times mankind have often
15 Parme|         may be used hereafter by modern inquirers. How, while mankind
16 Parme|    compare Republic).~And so, in modern times, because we are called