Dialogue

 1 Parme|       not.’~The Parmenides in point of style is one of the best
 2 Parme| period of his life, reached a point of view from which he was
 3 Parme|   Eleatic philosophy from the point of view of Zeno or the Megarians.
 4 Parme|      itself. But from another point of view, that which touches
 5 Parme|    must reach an intermediate point, which is equality. Moreover,
 6 Parme|     one has been reduced to a point, there is no use in saying
 7 Parme|     in existence, and in this point of view, as well as in the
 8 Parme|   them from every conceivable point of view. He is criticizing
 9 Parme|     first analyzed from every point of view the conception of ‘
10 Parme|   true which is not from some point of view untrue, nothing
11 Parme|     criticism to the furthest point, they still remain, a necessity
12 Parme|      would.~If then, in every point of view, the one and the
13 Parme|      what do you say to a new point of view? Must not that which
14 Parme|      becoming, it gets to the point of time between ‘was’ and ‘
15 Parme|    different portion —in this point of view the others must