Dialogue

 1 Parme|       like and unlike, which is a contradiction; and each division of your
 2 Parme|     subjective.’ ‘That would be a contradiction.’ ‘True; and therefore any
 3 Parme|      general notions. There is no contradiction in material things partaking
 4 Parme|        many; neither is there any contradiction in the ideas of one and
 5 Parme|            in themselves. But the contradiction arises when we attempt to
 6 Parme| Heracleitus, may have seen that a contradiction in terms is sometimes the
 7 Parme|          this without involving a contradiction. But is the contradiction
 8 Parme|         contradiction. But is the contradiction also the final conclusion?
 9 Parme|  inherence be in a part, the same contradiction follows: smallness will
10 Parme|     suddenness’ is based upon the contradiction which is involved in supposing
11 Parme|       unintelligible, e.g. in the contradiction which is elicited out of
12 Parme|     Socrates implies: There is no contradiction in the concrete, but in
13 Parme|         more palpable will be the contradiction. For just as nothing can
14 Parme|      remodelled. The negation and contradiction which are involved in the
15 Parme|           the Republic the law of contradiction and the unity of knowledge