Dialogue

 1 Parme|     hypothesis that~1. One is. 2. One is not. If one is,
 2 Parme|       the negative hypothesis: 2.a. If one is not one, it
 3 Parme|     not one, it is all things. 2.b. If one has not being,
 4 Parme|        the other or remainder: 2.aa. If one is not one, other
 5 Parme|     one, other things are all. 2.bb. If one has not being,
 6 Parme|      to one and to the others.~2.a. But, again, assume the
 7 Parme|   become and is not destroyed.~2.b. Once more, let us ask
 8 Parme| asserted of that which is not.~2.aa. Once more, if one is
 9 Parme|     separation, if one is not.~2.bb. Once more, let us inquire,
10 Parme|        sometimes of division: (2) The division or distinction
11 Parme|      been already discussing: (2) Parmenides has intimated
12 Parme|       other things.~Certainly.~2.a. Well, and ought we not
13 Parme|        nor is destroyed?~True.~2.b. And now, let us go back
14 Parme|  appears to be the conclusion.~2.aa. Yet once more; if one
15 Parme|       the many are?~Most true.~2.bb. Once more, let us go