Dialogue

 1 Parme|        The criticism on his own doctrine of Ideas has also been considered,
 2 Parme|        fatal assault on his own doctrine of Being, appears to be
 3 Parme|         the assumption that the doctrine of the Ideas was held by
 4 Parme|    traces of the transcendental doctrine of Ideas, that is, of their
 5 Parme|      own followers, with whom a doctrine of numbers quickly superseded
 6 Parme|    Hegelian propaedeutic of the doctrine of Ideas. The first of these
 7 Parme|         has extended to his own doctrine of Ideas. Nor is there any
 8 Parme|         opinions: first, on the doctrine of Ideas; secondly, of Being.
 9 Parme|       the difficulty of his own doctrine of Ideas, is far from denying
10 Parme|      far from denying that some doctrine of Ideas is necessary, and
11 Parme|       he criticizes the Eleatic doctrine of Being, not intending
12 Parme|        secondly, of the Eleatic doctrine of Being. Neither are absolutely
13 Parme| Platonic as well as the Eleatic doctrine must be remodelled. The
14 Parme|        inconsistency of his own doctrine of universals and draws