Dialogue

 1 Phaedr|  introducing or following it. The two Dialogues together contain
 2 Phaedr|     rhetoric, or the union of the two, or the relation of philosophy
 3 Phaedr| imputation is not denied, and the two agree to direct their steps
 4 Phaedr|            In all of us there are two principles—a better and
 5 Phaedr|      about the charioteer and his two steeds, the one a noble
 6 Phaedr|           that they shall use the two speeches as illustrations
 7 Phaedr|           will be found to embody two principles: first, that
 8 Phaedr|        Phaedrus depart.~There are two principal controversies
 9 Phaedr|  pervading a whole work, but one, two, or more, as the invention
10 Phaedr|          compare Symp.); in these two aspects of philosophy the
11 Phaedr|          to them in such matters. Two inexperienced persons, ignorant
12 Phaedr|           how the inferior of the two drags the other down to
13 Phaedr|          and say:—that there were two loves, a higher and a lower,
14 Phaedr|         mind cannot exist between two souls, until they are purified
15 Phaedr|           love was found: how the two passed their lives together
16 Phaedr|           to the formality of the two speeches (Socrates has a
17 Phaedr|   rhetoric), seems to be that the two speeches proceed upon the
18 Phaedr|           men under the figure of two winged steeds and a charioteer.
19 Phaedr|      thumos) of the Republic. The two steeds really correspond
20 Phaedr|         as the desires; and hence two things which to us seem
21 Phaedr|          the Symposium, there are two kinds of love, a lower and
22 Phaedr|          opposition between these two kinds of love may be compared
23 Phaedr|    indulgence of unnatural lusts.~Two other thoughts about love
24 Phaedr|        which takes many forms and two principal ones, having a
25 Phaedr|           lives of men. And these two, though opposed, are not
26 Phaedr|     injustice to himself. For the two cannot be fairly compared
27 Phaedr|           Plato. The first of the two great rhetoricians is described
28 Phaedr|       still alive? Moreover, when two Dialogues are so closely
29 Phaedr|       glimpses of a truth beyond.~Two short passages, which are
30 Phaedr|        the little touch about the two versions of the story, the
31 Phaedr|       about a hundred, or at most two hundred years if we exclude
32 Phaedr|          are observed to exchange two words they are supposed
33 Phaedr|          that he repeated himself two or three times, either from
34 Phaedr|       could say the same thing in two or three ways.~PHAEDRUS:
35 Phaedr|         every one of us there are two guiding and ruling principles
36 Phaedr|         after the best; and these two are sometimes in harmony
37 Phaedr|       allusion to a game in which two parties fled or pursued
38 Phaedr|         delicacy was shown in the two discourses; I mean, in my
39 Phaedr|        was a noble thing; for the two words, mantike and manike,
40 Phaedr|       inclined to mock; there are two lines in the apocryphal
41 Phaedr|     divided each soul into three— two horses and a charioteer;
42 Phaedr|          other careless hour, the two wanton animals take the
43 Phaedr|           wanton animals take the two souls when off their guard
44 Phaedr|       will no longer halt between two opinions, but will dedicate
45 Phaedr|            SOCRATES: Yes; and the two speeches happen to afford
46 Phaedr|           what way?~SOCRATES: The two speeches, as you may remember,
47 Phaedr|         And of madness there were two kinds; one produced by human
48 Phaedr|         of the hour were involved two principles of which we should
49 Phaedr|         carver might. Just as our two discourses, alike assumed,
50 Phaedr|     stumbled on a prescription or two, although he has no real