Dialogue

 1 Phaedr|       Whether the subject of the Dialogue is love or rhetoric, or
 2 Phaedr|        as the following—that the dialogue is not strictly confined
 3 Phaedr|        second to the date of the Dialogue.~There seems to be a notion
 4 Phaedr|          and that the unity of a dialogue requires a single subject.
 5 Phaedr|          to others. Nor does the dialogue appear to be a style of
 6 Phaedr|        his fancy wander. If each dialogue were confined to the development
 7 Phaedr|        appear on the face of the dialogue, nor could any controversy
 8 Phaedr|       arranged every part of the dialogue before he begins to write.
 9 Phaedr|       into which the rest of the Dialogue is worked, in parts embroidered
10 Phaedr|          the commencement of the Dialogue has described as his own
11 Phaedr|          of thought, there is no Dialogue superior, or perhaps equal
12 Phaedr|        to the second part of the Dialogue, which is a criticism on
13 Phaedr|       this latter portion of the Dialogue there are many texts which
14 Phaedr|   represented in the form of the Dialogue, seem to have misled him.
15 Phaedr|         prayer at the end of the Dialogue, ‘Give me beauty in the
16 Phaedr|      determining the date of the Dialogue are (1) the ages of Lysias
17 Phaedr|        should have to assign the Dialogue to a year not later than
18 Phaedr|          ancient critics, that a dialogue which treats of love must
19 Phaedr| conclusion seems to be, that the Dialogue was written at some comparatively
20 Phaedr|          the main subject of the Dialogue, may seem to merit a more
21 Phaedr|       occur in the course of the Dialogue, in order to preserve the
22 Phaedr|         As in the opening of the Dialogue he ridicules the interpreters
23 Phaedr|          PHAEDRUS~PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: Socrates, Phaedrus.~SCENE: