Dialogue

 1 Phaedr|   lovers love their loves.’ (Compare Char.) Here is the end;
 2 Phaedr| explanation (mantike, manike—compare oionoistike, oionistike, ‘’
 3 Phaedr|    inspiration of the Muses (compare Ion), without which no man
 4 Phaedr| teeth, are everywhere felt. (Compare Symp.) Father and mother,
 5 Phaedr|    inspiration akin to love (compare Symp.); in these two aspects
 6 Phaedr|   knows nothing of himself. (Compare Symp.) Regarded as a rhetorical
 7 Phaedr|     into a sort of earnest. (Compare Phaedo, Symp.) Or is he
 8 Phaedr|   and oionistike and imeros (compare Cratylus)? It is characteristic
 9 Phaedr|    but the will of the many (compare Republic). Is not legislation
10 Phaedr|     understood as a whole’? (Compare Charm.) And are not they
11 Phaedr|   barren of illustrations.’ (Compare Symp., Apol., Euthyphro.)~
12 Phaedr|  which may also be regarded (compare Soph.) as the process of
13 Phaedr|      at one.’ We may further compare the words of St. Paul, ‘
14 Phaedr|     assigning a later date. (Compare Tim., Soph., Laws.) Add
15 Phaedr|  ancient inventors of names (compare Cratylus), who would never
16 Phaedr|      understood as a whole. (Compare Charmides.)~SOCRATES: Yes,