Dialogue

 1 Phaedr|    rate is his nature. Now the characters of lovers depend upon the
 2 Phaedr|   knowledge of the natures and characters of men, which Socrates at
 3 Phaedr|      of God and man; how their characters were reflected upon one
 4 Phaedr|       the differences of human characters to which he afterwards refers.
 5 Phaedr|      he explains the different characters of men by referring them
 6 Phaedr|   having any insight into the ‘characters of men.’ Once more, has
 7 Phaedr|       inappropriateness of the characters of Plato. (Else, perhaps,
 8 Phaedr| connection with the historical characters to whom they belong. In
 9 Phaedr|    good prose. It had no great characters, and therefore it had no
10 Phaedr|      man estimates the various characters of his hearers and is able
11 Phaedr|        to the external written characters and not remember of themselves.