Dialogue

 1 Phileb|     Thucydides, the multiplication of ideas seems to interfere with
 2 Phileb|            attributes the flow of his ideas to a sudden inspiration.
 3 Phileb| transcendental theory of pre-existent ideas, which is chiefly discussed
 4 Phileb|               basis of desire. Of the ideas he treats in the same sceptical
 5 Phileb|            rapturous contemplation of ideas. Whether we attribute this
 6 Phileb|              was absorbed in abstract ideas, we can hardly be wrong
 7 Phileb|              to follow. A few leading ideas seem to emerge: the relation
 8 Phileb|             to begin in the region of ideas. He cannot understand how
 9 Phileb|               thrown on the nature of ideas when they were contrasted
10 Phileb|            relation in which abstract ideas stand to one another, and
11 Phileb|             many individuals, or ‘how ideas could be in and out of themselves,’
12 Phileb|            abstract conception of the Ideas in the same dialogue. Nor
13 Phileb|               pass into the sphere of ideas can hardly be distinguished.~
14 Phileb|             able to define objects or ideas, not in so far as they are
15 Phileb|               being the expression of ideas. But this higher and truer
16 Phileb|        respecting the ‘friends of the ideas’ and the ‘materialists’
17 Phileb|               much weight is given to ideas of measure and number, as
18 Phileb|         abstractions; which, like the ideas in the Parmenides, are always
19 Phileb|   indifference to his own doctrine of Ideas which he has already manifested
20 Phileb|          Cynics, Cyrenaics and of the ideas of Anaxagoras, in the Philebus,
21 Phileb|               of their own minds. The ideas which they are attempting
22 Phileb|              comparison. All words or ideas to which the words ‘gently,’ ‘
23 Phileb|             of a moral sense: Are our ideas of right and wrong innate
24 Phileb|               the origin of our moral ideas may be shortly summed up
25 Phileb|             us individually our moral ideas come first of all in childhood
26 Phileb|         inheritance or stock of moral ideas? Their beginning, like all
27 Phileb|           even the germs of our moral ideas. In the history of the world,
28 Phileb|         further remark that our moral ideas, as the world grows older,
29 Phileb|              the history of our moral ideas. We have to distinguish,
30 Phileb|               the origin of our moral ideas. These are not the roots
31 Phileb|              them—moral sense, innate ideas, a priori, a posteriori
32 Phileb|             But to decide how far our ideas of morality are derived
33 Phileb|          earliest and our most mature ideas of morality, we may now
34 Phileb|               under the same term two ideas so different as the subjective
35 Phileb|                For admitting that our ideas of obligation are partly
36 Phileb|             shall find that our moral ideas have originated not in utility
37 Phileb|              rate seeks to deduce our ideas of justice from the necessities
38 Phileb|              embodied. It moves among ideas of holiness, justice, love,
39 Phileb|        personified, what the Platonic ideas are to the idea of good.
40 Phileb|               of God with our highest ideas of truth and right there
41 Phileb|           discussions about universal ideas and definitions seem to
42 Phileb|              away; the correlation of ideas has taken their place. The
43 Phileb|             point of view of abstract ideas: or compare the simple manner