Dialogue

 1 Phileb|         word the corner-stone of moral philosophy? To the higher
 2 Phileb|       and others—the theory of a moral sense: Are our ideas of
 3 Phileb|          about the origin of our moral ideas may be shortly summed
 4 Phileb|      each of us individually our moral ideas come first of all
 5 Phileb|          inheritance or stock of moral ideas? Their beginning,
 6 Phileb|         us even the germs of our moral ideas. In the history of
 7 Phileb|          further remark that our moral ideas, as the world grows
 8 Phileb| corruption of society or by some moral disorder in the individual,
 9 Phileb|         immediate intuition. The moral sense comes last and not
10 Phileb|    outline of the history of our moral ideas. We have to distinguish,
11 Phileb|  morality with the origin of our moral ideas. These are not the
12 Phileb|        lights in which the whole moral world has been regarded
13 Phileb|          may answer: All of them—moral sense, innate ideas, a priori,
14 Phileb|         urge against a system of moral philosophy so beneficent,
15 Phileb|       extraordinary progress, in moral philosophy we are supposed
16 Phileb|         we are looking for a new moral world which has no marrying
17 Phileb|    circumstances such and such a moral principle is to be enforced,
18 Phileb|         extent commensurate with moral good and evil. We should
19 Phileb|         state which receives our moral approval.~Like Protarchus
20 Phileb|         said to be the ground of moral obligation, yet he must
21 Phileb|          the absoluteness of our moral standard; we reduce differences
22 Phileb|     object, but to elevate their moral nature. Both in his own
23 Phileb|      present a certain aspect of moral truth. None of them are,
24 Phileb|       them. Now the phenomena of moral action differ, and some
25 Phileb|        than if the other pole of moral philosophy had been excluded.
26 Phileb|        and is no longer the only moral philosophy, but one among
27 Phileb|           we shall find that our moral ideas have originated not
28 Phileb|        or utility in a system of moral philosophy?’ is analogous
29 Phileb|        the various principles of moral philosophy, we may now arrange