Dialogue

 1 Phileb| subjects of which they treat in common, such as the nature and
 2 Phileb|         had long been solved by common sense (‘solvitur ambulando’);
 3 Phileb|         elements, which have no common measure, and which cannot
 4 Phileb|         of pleasure and pain is common to both of them (Phil. Gorg.);
 5 Phileb|         Gorg.); there is also a common tendency in them to take
 6 Phileb|        they are different? What common property in all of them
 7 Phileb|   Socrates means to discuss the common question—how a sensible
 8 Phileb|      should they be called by a common name? Or, if the equivocal
 9 Phileb|     want?~But whence comes this common inheritance or stock of
10 Phileb|        not stop to reason about common honesty. Whenever we are
11 Phileb| happiness.’ For the term in the common use of language is only
12 Phileb|         question, ‘What is that common quality which in all states
13 Phileb|     than their signification in common language. And as words influence
14 Phileb|         they impart to others a common conception or conviction
15 Phileb|    content, so at variance with common language and opinion, does
16 Phileb|      Those, Protarchus, are the common and acknowledged paradoxes
17 Phileb|      imply, have not yet become common and acknowledged?~SOCRATES:
18 Phileb|        in consideration of this common bond which in a manner united
19 Phileb|        are very different; what common nature have we in view when
20 Phileb|        them;—is not this a very common mental phenomenon?~PROTARCHUS:
21 Phileb|        of pleasures with pains, common both to soul and body, which
22 Phileb|      sweet has a bitter, as the common saying is, and both together
23 Phileb| PROTARCHUS: Yes, that is a very common error.~SOCRATES: And still
24 Phileb| designate a particular art by a common term, thus making us believe