Dialogue

 1 Phileb|             categories and modes of conception, though ‘some of the old
 2 Phileb|         kinds of knowledge; (V) the conception of the good. We may then
 3 Phileb|           kind of difficulty as the conception of God existing both in
 4 Phileb|        first we have but a confused conception of them, analogous to the
 5 Phileb|         attribute to God, he had no conception.~The Greek conception of
 6 Phileb|            no conception.~The Greek conception of the infinite would be
 7 Phileb| determinatio est negatio’)’ and the conception of the one determines that
 8 Phileb|            attributing to Plato the conception of laws of nature derived
 9 Phileb|            concrete to the abstract conception of the Ideas in the same
10 Phileb|         which precede them. Plato’s conception is derived partly from the
11 Phileb|           nor anywhere, an adequate conception of the beautiful in external
12 Phileb|           above) that this personal conception of mind is confined to the
13 Phileb|         setting up his own concrete conception of good against the abstract
14 Phileb|          the useful’ to some higher conception, such as the Platonic ideal,
15 Phileb|        religion and with any higher conception both of politics and of
16 Phileb|         have added something to our conception of Ethics; no one of them
17 Phileb|            may be based upon such a conception.~But then for the familiar
18 Phileb|          general, to strengthen our conception of the virtues by showing
19 Phileb|           impart to others a common conception or conviction of the nature
20 Phileb|           conceive virtue under the conception of law, the philanthropist
21 Phileb|            of a single metaphysical conception? The necessary imperfection
22 Phileb|     invention of the Syllogism, the conception of happiness as the foundation
23 Phileb|           or ‘superior person.’ His conception of ousia, or essence, is