Dialogue

 1 Phileb|             discard’. We admit that Utility is coextensive with right,
 2 Phileb|             to have the doctrine of utility habitually inculcated on
 3 Phileb|    referring actions to the test of utility have we to make a laborious
 4 Phileb|            has been contrasted with Utility by Paley and others—the
 5 Phileb|      proceed to state the theory of Utility, not exactly in the words,
 6 Phileb|         right or desirable is their utility, or tendency to promote
 7 Phileb|          carry out the principle of utility who sacrificed his own pleasure
 8 Phileb|          enthusiastic supporters of utility; while among their contemporaries,
 9 Phileb|            maintain the doctrine of utility, are fond of repeating that
10 Phileb|           actions under the head of utility; they would not deny that
11 Phileb|        Further, it is admitted that utility and right coincide, not
12 Phileb|            will be taught that when utility and right are in apparent
13 Phileb|     apparent conflict any amount of utility does not alter by a hair’
14 Phileb|         adequately on principles of utility; in attempting to do so
15 Phileb|        dissatisfied with the words ‘utility’ or ‘pleasure’: their principle
16 Phileb|             degree, the doctrine of utility must be so transfigured
17 Phileb|      inculcated on the principle of utility than on any other. The question
18 Phileb|        ideas have originated not in utility but in religion, in law,
19 Phileb| conclusively disproves the claim of utility to be the basis of morals.
20 Phileb|            thousand years and more, utility, if not the originating,
21 Phileb|           the place of happiness or utility in a system of moral philosophy?’