Dialogue

 1 Phileb|    omission to mention them by name has created the same uncertainty
 2 Phileb|     and gave to each of them a name, and assigned them to the
 3 Phileb|     they be called by a common name? Or, if the equivocal or
 4 Phileb|     day it is rare to hear his name received with any mark of
 5 Phileb|     works which pass under the name of Aristotle, whether we
 6 Phileb|   Aphrodite, but that her real name is Pleasure.~PROTARCHUS:
 7 Phileb|     her nature is. She has one name, and therefore you would
 8 Phileb|      should I be worthy of the name of dialectician if, in order
 9 Phileb|    their descendants under the name of harmonies; and the affections
10 Phileb|       each and all of them the name of letters; and observing
11 Phileb|        the cause in all except name; the agent and the cause
12 Phileb|       as I was saying, only in name—shall we not?~PROTARCHUS:
13 Phileb|       we call them by a single name?~PROTARCHUS: By heavens,
14 Phileb|     good, or by any honourable name?~PROTARCHUS: Not if the
15 Phileb| required. For what in Heaven’s name is the feeling to be called
16 Phileb|       is in short the specific name which is used to describe
17 Phileb|       nature, and yet only one name.~PROTARCHUS: Let us boldly
18 Phileb|     says, that in nature as in name they are two, and that wisdom
19 Phileb|     pleasures or by some other name?—would you rather live with