Dialogue

 1 Phileb|        the existence of the many (compare Parm.). Zeno illustrated
 2 Phileb|   intermediate links which occur (compare Bacon’s ‘media axiomata’)
 3 Phileb|          metaphysical enthusiasm (compare Republic). But they are
 4 Phileb|         as positive and negative (compare ‘Omnis determinatio est
 5 Phileb|          in relation to the mind (compare Aristot. Nic. Ethics). The
 6 Phileb|   principle of rest as of motion (compare Charm. Cratyl.). A later
 7 Phileb|          proceed from hypotheses (compare Republic). (4) The sixth
 8 Phileb|           money’ on the Sophists (compare Apol.; Crat.; Protag.).
 9 Phileb|          class. How, then, can we compare them? Are we not liable,
10 Phileb|        experience of both kinds. (Compare a similar argument urged
11 Phileb|        view of abstract ideas: or compare the simple manner in which
12 Phileb|         not forget to examine and compare the two. And these goods,
13 Phileb| arithmetic.~SOCRATES: And when we compare the art of mensuration which