Dialogue

 1 Phileb|           image of a victim, into parts or members, ‘according to
 2 Phileb|       dividing the whole into its parts we should bisect in the
 3 Phileb| acknowledge that a whole has many parts, that the continuous is
 4 Phileb|        without the reunion of the parts into a whole. And hence
 5 Phileb|           above-mentioned are the parts. Still the question recurs, ‘
 6 Phileb|         whole differ from all the parts?’ And if we are unable to
 7 Phileb|     person proves the members and parts of anything to be divided,
 8 Phileb|            and does not reach the parts affected; then if you put
 9 Phileb|     pleasure or pain in the inner parts, which contrasts and mingles
10 Phileb|         case may be, of the outer parts; and this is due to the
11 Phileb|       SOCRATES: Knowledge has two parts,—the one productive, and